Wikidata:Property proposal/logo image within scope
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
logo image within scope
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Not done
Description | branding for this item within a particular context; use 'of' (P642) qualifier |
---|---|
Data type | Commons media file |
Allowed values | images |
Example 1 | FC Cincinnati (Q20855983) → File:MLS crest logo RGB - FC Cincinnati.svg (of (P642) → Major League Soccer (Q18543)) |
Example 2 | The Citadel Bulldogs (Q6144236) → File:SoCon logo in Citadel colors.svg (of (P642) → Southern Conference (Q941898)) |
Example 3 | West Virginia Mountaineers (Q3326071) → File:Big 12 logo in West Virginia colors.svg (of (P642) → Big 12 Conference (Q858430)) |
Example 4 | Appalachian State Mountaineers (Q5136020) → File:Sun Belt logo in Appalachian State colors.svg (of (P642) → Sun Belt Conference (Q1536131)) |
Example 5 | Appalachian State Mountaineers (Q5136020) → File:SoCon logo in Appalachian State colors.svg (of (P642) → Southern Conference (Q941898)) |
See also | logo image (P154) |
Motivation
[edit]There are often cases where we have a logo for an item that is not suited for general use in all scenarios; instead, it should only be used when talking about that item in a particular context. IagoQnsi (talk) 20:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Comment @IagoQnsi: For completeness' sake, could you give an example with two logos for the same item with different values for this proposed qualifier? Mahir256 (talk) 00:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Mahir256: Okay, I added two logos for the Appalachian State Mountaineers, who switched from SoCon to Sun Belt Conference in 2014. --IagoQnsi (talk) 01:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose, especially with the of (P642) qualifier. logo image (P154) with a suitable applies qualifier would be better. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 02:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I think doing Appalachian State Mountaineers (Q5136020)logo image (P154)File:Sun Belt logo in Appalachian State colors.svg
of (P642)Sun Belt Conference (Q1536131) would be sufficient. I didn't find another qualifier for this use case, as ChristianKl suggested. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 19:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC) - Not done There is no obvious consensus to promote creation. (`・ω・´) (talk) 03:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)