Wikidata:Property proposal/main upper course
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
main upper course
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science
Not done
Description | hydrological feature describes main upstream following (not necessarily linked) watercourse/headstream/course/reach with different name determined on the basis of hydrological criteria |
---|---|
Represents | upper course (Q2182740) |
Data type | Item |
Template parameter | for articles with filled parametr |zdrojnice= in cs:template:Infobox - vodní tok |
Domain | watercourse (Q355304) |
Allowed values | Instance of subclasses of watercourse (Q355304) |
Example 1 | Regen (Q317036) → Schwarzer Regen (Q19655112) with qualifier criterion used (P1013) = length (Q36253) |
Example 2 | Schwarzer Regen (Q19655112) → Großer Regen (Q17778628) with qualifiers criterion used (P1013) = length (Q36253) & discharge (Q8737769) |
Example 3 | Amazon (Q3783) → Marañón River (Q200174) with qualifier criterion used (P1013) = discharge (Q8737769) |
Example 4 | Amazon (Q3783) → Ucayali River (Q200952) with qualifier criterion used (P1013) = length (Q36253) |
Planned use | use it for rivers |
Motivation
[edit]Rivers have different names in their upper courses and this is the way how to define (and find) main watercourse determined on the basis of hydrological criteria (river lenght, catchment area, discharge). -xfi- (talk) 20:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]Comment. The way I see it, you should just use a qualifier on tributary (P974). Thierry Caro (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Thierry Caro: Main upper course is subproperty of tributary (P974). I understand that is possible to use qualifier value of statement has role (P3831) & item „main upper course“ with qualifier criterion used (P1013) & length (Q36253) (or discharge (Q8737769)). But great rivers have many tributaries and often only one, or two main upper courses. So with this property it should be well arranged and uncluttered. ---xfi- (talk) 18:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose I am not convinced, I dont see the problem of using the qualifier on tributary (P974). What exact problem do you want to solve here? Also, there is still the property follows (P155) if you really need a high level property (and also replaces (P1365) even though that does not seem to be correct here). I think either using the qualifier or possibly expanding the definition of follows (P155) should be sufficient. --Hannes Röst (talk) 13:35, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Not done - no support for the proposal --DannyS712 (talk) 01:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)