Wikidata:Property proposal/station category

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

station category

[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Transportation

Descriptioncategory of a railway station, assigned by its operator; for example DB Station&Service (Germany), Rete Ferroviaria Italiana (Italy) and National Rail (Great Britain) all assign each of their stations to a category. For example, each Italian station is classified as platinum, gold, silver or bronze; in Germany, the categories are numbered 1 to 7; and so on. "Issued by" should be a mandatory statement.
Data typeItem
Template parameter"DfT category" in en:template:Infobox GB station; "Category" in en:Template:Infobox station
Domainrailway stations (possibly bus and metro stations as well)
Example 1Casteldebole railway halt (Q3969301)bronze
Example 2Welwyn Garden City railway station (Q2723798)C1
Example 3Lichtenfels (Q324749)3
Sourceen:German railway station categories, en:United Kingdom railway station categories
Robot and gadget jobs
See alsoP5105 (P5105), P5330 (P5330)

Motivation

To provide railway stations with a unique property concerning their official classification, subsuming the current P5105 (P5105) and P5330 (P5330) (and avoiding proliferation of similar properties for other railway systems). Fabio Bettani (talk) 13:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

@Fabio Bettani, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Pigsonthewing: @Jura1, Liuxinyu970226, Thryduulf, Jklamo: ✓ Done - however, I have not created any of the necessary items, nor added the associated example statements (which would require those category items) so there's still work to be done here! ArthurPSmith (talk)

  • From the discussion, it doesn't seem entirely clear if this should be a parent property or replace the existing ones. What's the outcome?
    --- Jura 19:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm very surprised this has been created when most (all?) of the supporting infrastructure in terms of items and their constraints are undefined. Without them it isn't possible to answer the points brought up in this discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]