Wikidata:Property proposal/type of deterioration
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
deterioration
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Motivation
[edit]We believe that this property is particularly relevant for Structured Data on Commons. Our planned use is to describe scanned photographs. It can also be used to describe other works of art. This has been discussed in the GLAM-Wiki global telegram group. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Piracalamina (talk • contribs) at 20:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
Discussion
[edit]- Creating this property after discussion on Wikidata:Property proposal/image decay
- Support Also I think this is aligned with the P44 has condition property of CIDOC CRM (Q624005). —Ismael Olea (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a reason to prefer calling this "type of deterioration" instead of just calling it "deterioration"? Intuitively, I would prefer the shorter label but I'm unsure whether anyone sees problems with it. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 21:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm fine with it being named just "deterioration". I proposed "type of..." only because it's the literal translation of the field label used by the CdF's catalogue: https://cdf.montevideo.gub.uy/catalogo/foto/09904fmhge ("Tipo de deterioro"). Piracalamina (talk) 13:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- This needs to be kept distinct from state of conservation (P5816) for buildings, so weathered, burnt out etc, but not ruined, demolished. Vicarage (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- good point! That said, I support the proposal; it sounds like a good idea Jerimee (talk) 01:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Piracalamina, Olea, Jerimee, Vicarage, ChristianKl: Done as deterioration (P12680). Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)