Wikidata:Property proposal/Law Insider Legal Dictionary entry
Law Insider Legal Dictionary entry
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Lexemes
Motivation
[edit]Law Insider (Q115934429)'s Legal Dictionary (Q115934436) provides an abundance of definitions of legal terms that could be included in items for legal concepts or lexemes. The site provides a browseable dictionary of terms as well as a search option that allows users to search for exact phrases and to exclude keywords. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 02:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]Support --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 00:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Support --Emwille (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Support --cstrickler (talk) 13:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Comment Why this property should be used on items, lexemes and senses instead of just items or senses? Midleading (talk) 09:53, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think we should limit this to lexemes only. So9q (talk) 13:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Comment @UWashPrincipalCataloger, Tinker Bell, Emwille, Kiwigirl3850, Midleading, So9q: this property is almost ready for creation but it would be good to clarify the domain of use first. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: I've revised it to just items and lexemes. AdamSeattle (talk) 01:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- For items I think the ID only makes sense as a reference. Infrastruktur (talk) 11:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
IIRC Krbot might not generate constraint reports if there is different property scopes for items and lexemes so perhaps it's best to be permissive here?Edit: Nevermind, I was thinking of property constraints using the constraint scope qualifier here. Infrastruktur (talk) 11:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- In general, I think external identifiers should always be allowed as statements.
- I might also use it as a qualifier on “described by source” statements. PKM (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. That some people would like a more restrictive property scope, myself included, is not a good reason to delay property creation. So as far as I'm concerned this proposal is ready for creation. Infrastruktur (talk) 17:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
@UWashPrincipalCataloger, Midleading, So9q, AdamSeattle, Infrastruktur: Done Harej (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)