Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/NatigKrolik
From Wikidata
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- closed as unsuccessful (1/14/0 | 6.6666666666667%) -- Bene* talk 13:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vote
RfP scheduled to end after 4 November 2013 12:52 (UTC)
- NatigKrolik (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I'm an active editor on Wikidata with 2,005 edits and many Rfds. I would like to help out with items nominated for deletion. — NatigKrolik ™ contributions 12:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Votes
[edit]I can Support this preliminarily, as I've seen the user's good work at RfD. I can be swayed to oppose if something comes up, though. TCN7JM 03:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Oooooooh...ouch. Sorry, buddy. ( Oppose) TCN7JM 22:02, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good RfD work. Ajraddatz (Talk) 14:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Preliminary Support. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 15:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]Waiting for reply. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Oppose per sock puppetry. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rzuwig► 16:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Oppose per sock puppetry. Rzuwig► 16:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Oppose --DangSunM (talk) 23:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose — per below. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Blocked indefinitely on home wiki, per below.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:55, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I have asked this user, and am waiting for reply. Can change it to support or oppose.--GZWDer (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Oppose It is the breach of trust, that takes a long time to re-earn.(billinghurst said there.) 3 months (from August 1, when this user is blocked indefinitely) is too short. It is much shorter than 6 months above, so I can't support.--GZWDer (talk) 06:32, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral will wait for reply.--Vyom25 (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]- No way.... Oppose may be my first one. ;(--Vyom25 (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wait for his reply. --by ReviDCMG at 13:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Oppose I don't care about the signature, socking is enough to be an automatic oppose for me. --Rschen7754 18:38, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose as above. --Stryn (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose for sock puppetry and "disruptive edits, edit warring and vandalism on hywp. User does not really have an extraordinary track record here.--Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 19:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per above. Sorry, --Ricordisamoa 01:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- What happen of your account at hy.wp? Sorry, I don't understand of անպատշաճ ստորագրություն. -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Google Translate tells me "improper signatures" though I would appreciate further clarification. --Rschen7754 02:19, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- signatures is certainly not a reason to oppose in Wikidata.--GZWDer (talk) 03:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If something is so bad as to elicit from the community the support for an indef block, then I would say that creates for me some concerns about the user's behaviour and/or attitude. For example, if it was for something as simple as signatures, but the user refused to modify it, that could say something about stubbornness. TCN7JM 04:05, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- signatures is certainly not a reason to oppose in Wikidata.--GZWDer (talk) 03:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Google Translate tells me "improper signatures" though I would appreciate further clarification. --Rschen7754 02:19, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The candidate engaged in sock-puppetry on the Armenian Wikipedia, confirmed in a CheckUser here. See the reason on that CheckUser request for additional details from an Armenian Wikipedia admin. In addition, that wasn't the first block. The Anonymouse (talk) 18:26, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, some of those accounts have edited Wikidata. To be fair, all the edits were before we adopted our sockpuppetry policy. --Rschen7754 22:09, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]