Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Jitrixis
From Wikidata
(Redirected from Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Jitrixis)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Done Promoted, set to expire 2013-02-10. — MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:20, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I like the project wikidata and I want to maintain and clean up Wikidata delete empty item or duplicated item etc... --Jitrixis (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
and also add script on the gadget tab --Jitrixis (talk) 22:02, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Emijrp (talk) 20:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Mattho69 (talk) 23:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, Le pro du 94 :) (talk) 15:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 15:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Good afternoon Rome2 (talk) 15:43, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support He makes good work on Wikipédia fr. Jules78120 (talk) 17:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Zoldik (talk) 15:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose - his current signature links here with a call to support this. No. Canvassing is highly inappropriate.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose I oppose, but not because of his edits, but because of his signature ("support my candidacy" with link here) I expect more from a candidate for admin. If you fix your signature, I may reconsider. PiRSquared17 (talk) 03:15, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Somewhere between neutral and weak oppose now that signature is fixed. I'm still a little disappointed that he'd even consider canvassing, but he acknowledged his mistake and fixed it, which is the responsible thing to do. PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I do this, because i received this on my french talk page frwiki diff and it's why I think it was allowed, but now I understand my mistake.--Jitrixis (talk) 22:56, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Somewhere between neutral and weak oppose now that signature is fixed. I'm still a little disappointed that he'd even consider canvassing, but he acknowledged his mistake and fixed it, which is the responsible thing to do. PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support The signature is clumsy, but the user is highly motivated and does a great work — Arkanosis ✉ 15:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Agree with Arkanosis. --Dalton2 (talk) 04:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --CENNOXX (talk) 23:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support !!! Jules78120 (talk) 20:55, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support trusted user who creates very useful scripts --Bene* (talk) 22:12, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support for scripts --Lomita (talk) 23:39, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]