Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Wildly boy

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as unsuccessful. Please, take the remarks made into account, and consider gaining more experience first. Lymantria (talk) 11:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wildly boy[edit]

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 2 February 2019 03:42 (UTC)

Hello, I'm applying for sysop permission at Wikidata in order to help solving RFD and fighting vandalism.Although the number of editors I have in this program is not a lot，I think I have enough anti-vandalism experience because I'm a rollbacker and patrol recent changes almost every day.And I want to help Chinese users on this project with this permission like giving the ipbe to help them through avoid there can't editing because of they use some proxy.Thanks. --Catherine LaurenceTalk 03:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

  1.  Support looks fine to me. We need sysops who speak other languages than English. Pamputt (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Weak  Support. I don't see very wide experience across multiple areas of the project, and also don't see much countervandalism experience here, but I do see some and what I have examined seems good. If you are elected, please take it slow and ask lots of questions. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose We're not big into edit counts here but 691 is low for adminship. Would reconsider with more experience. --Rschen7754 21:36, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Tend to  Oppose per Rschen7754. Mahir256 (talk) 07:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Maybe not now.  Neutral to me. Stang 15:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  NeutralGood work but a little too soon, per Stang.--Cohaf (talk) 04:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Oppose Their countervandalism work is not bad, but as said above, maybe now is not the time. Esteban16 (talk) 16:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Oppose too early, too naive. Saw their interactions elsewhere, and think rollbacker is sufficient at this time for the expressed role.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Weak oppose. The candidate has a fair amount of cross-wiki experience and an adequate understanding of wiki principles, and appears to demonstrate a genuine use case for sysop rights. However, the candidate's experience on Wikidata is a bit weak, and the syntax error in the signature (it used namespace aliases that work on some Wikipedias but don't work on Wikidata) swayed me towards the oppose side. I would recommend contributing more in their current capacity as rollbacker, and reapplying with a few more months of experience. Deryck Chan (talk) 11:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • 想問幾條問題，歡迎用粵文、中文、或英文答。
    1. 你最自豪嘅維基數據貢獻係乜？
    2. 如果你做到管理員，你會用咩條件決定畀唔畀 IPBE？
    3. 可唔可以解釋下你個簽名「Catherine Laurence」？Deryck Chan (talk) 18:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

回答：

  1. 私以为每次将破坏编辑恢复到正常的编辑，这是最自豪的。因为在下觉得维基数据的每一个项中的数据都应该是真实，可靠，可供查证的。而破坏编辑通常都是带有恶作剧性的，譬如将男性更改为女性，将出生日期由1725年更改为2050年。这样会让人觉得进了个搞笑的网站而不是严谨的。
  2. 判断一个人是否应得到ipbe，我会查看他在全域各个项目的情况，譬如编辑数，在其他维基计划有没有被封禁或被查出有滥用过傀儡的情况。其次，我会看他所处的情况是否真的非使用代理不可，如果是那就看看他是否拥有gipbe，因为根据愚的经验绝大多数的代理都能通过gipbe来避免ip封禁。但只有极少数例外譬如有次在下的ip刚好和某个破坏者的ip属于同一个ip段。所以在下才在那后申请本地ipbe来避免这种情况再次发生。当然如果有人也遇到像在下这种情况在下会先进行确认，为真则看情况来给临时的ipbe。
  3. 签名“Catherine Laurence”为在下的一个傀儡帐号。当初注册是为了在公共场所使用，后来就因为有2fa故不再使用。

--Catherine LaurenceTalk 08:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

  • 承第三题，为什么选择 Catherine Laurence 和 Wildly boy 这两个名字？这两个名字一个女性化，一个男性化，您希望使用有性别语言的编者用女性人称还是男性人称称呼您？Deryck Chan (talk) 12:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Administrator/Wildly_boy&oldid=980769504"