Wikidata:Property proposal/case number (mainland China)

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

case number (mainland China)[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

Descriptionidentifier for a legal case in the jurisdiction of mainland China
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainmainland China court decision (Q125456254), legal case (Q2334719)
Example 1Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (Q183080)288514
Example 2Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification (Q3604191)291784
Example 3Leader of the Opposition (Q20725785)199188
Example 4Copyright Act 1911 (Q5169215)180315
External linksUse in sister projects: [ar][de][en][es][fr][he][it][ja][ko][nl][pl][pt][ru][sv][vi][zh][commons][species][wd][en.wikt][fr.wikt].
Planned useTo be used for adding all court decisions from mainland China.
Number of IDs in sourcearound 45 574 000 cases assigned with a case number in the year of 2023.[1]
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886) (Not all cases have written judgement text published to the public.)
Formatter URLhttps://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/$1
Countrymainland China (Q7262427)
See alsoSupreme Court of Canada case number (P12592), U. S. Supreme Court docket number (P7063), Supreme Court of Sweden case number (P8407)
Distinct-values constraintyes

Motivation[edit]

This property is a copycat of Supreme Court of Canada case number (P12592) to help identify cases in mainland China, i.e. the WTO China.

Case number is an unique* id-like text assigned for one legal proceeding, referencing the year the case was filed, court responsible for the judgement, trial type (first/appeal/retrial/restraining order etc.) and a sequence number of this trial type in that court.

It is shown on all formal legal documents related to that case. The case number for the previous legal proceeding must be cited in the appealing judgement text. See red links in s:zh:最高人民法院(2018)最高法行再128号行政裁定书(year) means legal proceedings, while 〔year〕 means out-of-court administrative decisions and appeals (lit. Administrative Reconsideration).

However, when the court doesn't want people to dig into a specific case, they don't exposure the case number in the press releases. For example, the case number or its full judgement text was never published for Kris Wu scandal (Q107612866), as of today.

Note: It is considered unique for cases filed in the recent years, using computer systems. I can't guarantee all case numbers don't conflict with each other before the nation-wide digitization, like before 2010.

I don't suggest restricting user input with regex. Third party like WIPO Lex use their own way to transliteration case numbers (e.g. Commercial Press Co., Ltd. V. Sinolingua Co., Ltd. (2016) J 73 MC No. 277, Beijing Intellectual Property Court) and the result doesn't fit to existing formatting, but it's still worth preserving when no corresponding Chinese number is available. A regex may also block case numbers before ~1970 from entering.

-XsLiDian (talk) 05:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. "最高人民法院工作报告". 全国各级法院收案4557.4万件,结案4526.8万件,同比分别增长15.6%、13.4%。 For the year of 2023: "45574k new cases; 45268k newly-resolved cases."

Discussion[edit]

Vladimir Alexiev Jonathan Groß Andy Mabbett Jneubert Sic19 Wikidelo ArthurPSmith PKM Ettorerizza Fuzheado Daniel Mietchen Iwan.Aucamp Epìdosis Sotho Tal Ker Bargioni Carlobia Pablo Busatto Matlin Msuicat Uomovariabile Silva Selva 1-Byte Alessandra.Moi CamelCaseNick Songceci moz AhavaCohen Kolja21 RShigapov Jason.nlw MasterRus21thCentury Newt713 Pierre Tribhou Powerek38 Ahatd JordanTimothyJames Silviafanti Back ache AfricanLibrarian M.roszkowski Rhagfyr Haseeb 沈澄心 MrBenjo S.v.Mering

Notified participants of WikiProject Authority control Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]