Property talk:P11484

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

does not use
item or concept not used by the subject but that could have been expected
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200), Wikibase property (Q29934218), Wikibase form (Q54285143), Wikibase sense (Q54285715): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P11484#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P11484#Scope, SPARQL
Contemporaries:
if [item A] has this property (does not use (P11484)) linked to [item B],
then [item A] and [item B] have to coincide or coexist at some point of history. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P11484#Contemporary, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P11484#citation needed

Narrow the scope[edit]

@AdamSeattle Since you created this property with unresolved comments, I suggest that we immediately narrow the scope before we get too much misusage. The property should only be used on common misconceptions, or else we can in principle add almost all items to any statement (for example, there must be millions of astronomical objects and journal articles in Wikidata that Wikimedia Foundation does not use, but clearly, those should not be added). Ainali (talk) 10:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was marked as ready for creation, so I created it. Feel free to revise it to add a scope/usage note if you think that is needed. AdamSeattle (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]