Property talk:P1598

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

consecrator
bishop who presided as consecrator or co-consecrator of this bishop
Descriptionbishop who presided as consecrator or co-consecrator of this bishop
Representsconsecrator and co-consecrator (Q4231232)
Data typeItem
Template parameter"consecrated_by" in en:Infobox Christian leader (and "consecrated" for the date)
Domain
According to statements in the property:
person (Q215627)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed valuesinstance of (P31) position held (P39): bishop (Q29182) or subclass (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExamplePope Francis (Q450675)Antonio Quarracino (Q604515)
Fabio Fabene (Q15734379)Pope Francis (Q450675)
Sourcehttp://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P1598 (Q23909021)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total87,802
Main statement87,22099.3% of uses
Qualifier5810.7% of uses
Reference1<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Item “position held (P39): archbishop (Q49476), cardinal (Q45722), auxiliary bishop (Q75178), Catholic archbishop (Q48629921), bishop of the Old Catholic Church (Q63385538), metropolitan (Q189854), titular bishop (Q948657), titular archbishop (Q50362553), patriarch (Q171692), pope (Q19546), Latin Catholic bishop (Q102039658), catholic eparch (Q60232704), diocesan bishop (Q1144278), antipope (Q172748), Roman Catholic metropolitan archbishop (Q105393558), Bishop of the Evangelical Church of the Augsburg Confession in Poland (Q9171997), archbishop of Kalocsa (Q115706887), Archbishop of Esztergom (Q991848), coadjutor bishop (Q853982), vicar apostolic (Q15253909): Items with this property should also have “position held (P39): archbishop (Q49476), cardinal (Q45722), auxiliary bishop (Q75178), Catholic archbishop (Q48629921), bishop of the Old Catholic Church (Q63385538), metropolitan (Q189854), titular bishop (Q948657), titular archbishop (Q50362553), patriarch (Q171692), pope (Q19546), Latin Catholic bishop (Q102039658), catholic eparch (Q60232704), diocesan bishop (Q1144278), antipope (Q172748), Roman Catholic metropolitan archbishop (Q105393558), Bishop of the Evangelical Church of the Augsburg Confession in Poland (Q9171997), archbishop of Kalocsa (Q115706887), Archbishop of Esztergom (Q991848), coadjutor bishop (Q853982), vicar apostolic (Q15253909)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Item P39
Value type “human (Q5): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value human (Q5) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Value type Q5, SPARQL
Property “given name (P735)” declared by target items of “consecrator (P1598): If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “given name (P735)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Target required claim P735, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)
Property “sex or gender (P21): male (Q6581097)” declared by target items of “consecrator (P1598): If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “sex or gender (P21): male (Q6581097)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Target required claim P21, SPARQL
Property “date of birth (P569)” declared by target items of “consecrator (P1598): If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “date of birth (P569)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Target required claim P569, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)
Qualifiers “object has role (P3831), reason for deprecated rank (P2241), reason for preferred rank (P7452): this property should be used only with the listed qualifiers. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
Type “person (Q215627): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “person (Q215627)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Type Q215627, SPARQL
Item “given name (P735): Items with this property should also have “given name (P735)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Item P735, search, SPARQL
Item “sex or gender (P21): male (Q6581097): Items with this property should also have “sex or gender (P21): male (Q6581097)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Item P21, search, SPARQL
Item “position held (P39): Items with this property should also have “position held (P39)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#Item P39, search, SPARQL
Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1598#citation needed

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Qualifier suggestions[edit]

Not all bishops are male[edit]

In using sex or gender (P21) there are some exeptions like Eva Brunne (Q121753) Maria Jepsen (Q69074) Victoria Matthews (Q2522776) Rosemarie Wenner (Q91157)

Statement vs qualifier[edit]

In my opinion, it should be used as qualifier of the bishop (Q29182) when appears as position held (P39) or occupation (P106) of a person (see John Paul II (Q989) as exemple). It make no sense as statement, because it is not a personal characteristic, it's a characteristic of its bishop (Q29182) condition, it means a characteristic of the relationship person-status. Any opinion ?. --Amadalvarez (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change (English) label to "consecrated by" ?[edit]

It might be easier to figure out who consecrated whom with a label "consecrated by" or "has consecrator" instead of the current "consecrator". It shouldn't change the way the property is used. --- Jura 15:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Widening the property?[edit]

@Jura1, Giftzwerg 88: (and Hsarrazin / Thierry Caro) hello. I suggest the property to be widened to diaconal and priestly ordinations. Consecration is indeed the logical following of these two sacraments, that also deal with the notion of apostolic succession. What do you think?

Thanks! Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:07, 14 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I think in these case of a priest or diacon it is not appropriate. Maybe it has some siginificance in the life of the priest, but I don´t think it has the same gravitas in the life of the bishop. After all the thousands of priests and diacons are not notable, so these persons must have some more criteria other than ordination to make them notable.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 09:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, sure... I never said that being ordained de facto makes a priest WD-notable. I only would like to deal with the mention of the ordination of the notable ones (including bishops that are first priests...). Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]
I agree that this property existing already, we should probably deal with all similar things through dedicated properties rather than significant person (P3342). Now… should this property see its scope widened or should we get a new property for cases that are not covered yet? For the sake of avoiding multiple qualifiers on bishops, I guess I would rather have a brand new property for priestly ordinations. But then I wouldn't be shocked if we ended up having everything stored under one roof. Thierry Caro (talk) 09:42, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Could you please discuss this example? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 12:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]
OK. If this is already used that way regardless of whether or not this is for bishops, then I guess we can just rename this property here right away! You have my support. Thierry Caro (talk) 13:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Include occupation as well?[edit]

@Epìdosis, shouldn't some of these constraints be under occupation (P106) now, rather than position held (P39)? Elizium23 (talk) 03:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: of course; it should be ok now. --Epìdosis 07:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]