Property talk:P3842
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Documentation
located in the present-day administrative territorial entity
the item was located in the territory of this present-day administrative unit; however the two did not at any point coexist in time
the item was located in the territory of this present-day administrative unit; however the two did not at any point coexist in time
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Conflicts with “instance of (P31): human (Q5), Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410), Wikimedia category (Q4167836), Wikimedia template (Q11266439), Wikimedia module (Q15184295)”: this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Conflicts with P31, SPARQL
Item “dissolved, abolished or demolished date (P576)”: Items with this property should also have “dissolved, abolished or demolished date (P576)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Item P576, SPARQL
Type “administrative territorial entity (Q56061)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “administrative territorial entity (Q56061)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Type Q56061, SPARQL
Value type “administrative territorial entity (Q56061)”: This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value administrative territorial entity (Q56061) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Value type Q56061, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Scope, SPARQL
Constraints[edit]
Discussion[edit]
Complex relations[edit]
@Jura1, Jheald, ArthurPSmith, Pigsonthewing, ChristianKl: Who all were involved in the PP. Ytterlännäs rural municipality (Q10723852) existed until 1974, when it was dissolved. Today you find Kramfors Municipality (Q514815) here. Q514815 was founded 1971 and expanded the following years. So to some extent, these two coexisted for a few years! But Ytterlännäs did not become a part of Kramfors until after it was dissolved. I think this property makes sense here, even if it does not fulfil every letter in the present description! -- Innocent bystander (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)