Property talk:P6266

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6266#Single value, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6266#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200), Wikibase lexeme (Q51885771): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6266#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6266#Scope, SPARQL

Domain of the property[edit]

I would like to point out that this property for lexemes has so far only been used on Q elements.

If it is used on a lexeme, the current constraints indicate an inaccuracy. See for example banalità (L18780).

In my opinion, the best thing to do would be to change the constraint so that the property is used correctly, remove the uses with Q elements, and start populating correct use cases. What do you think? @User:Epìdosis @User:ArthurPSmith @User:Gerwoman @User:ZI_Jony @User:Spinoziano @User:Dcflyer --Luca.favorido (talk) 06:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On it.wikipedia Garzanti is used in articles (with it:Template:Garzanti) but it is a dictionary: it would be correct to be able to use it for both lexemes and Q elements, in the same way as Property:P5844.--Spinoziano (talk) 07:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Surely the scope needs to be extended to lexemes, as originarily proposed (I edited the property); I'm not fully sure about keeping items in the scope, but probably it's the best option, as suggested by @Spinoziano:. Epìdosis 09:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest to keep both items and lexemes in scope. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]