Property talk:P6275
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Documentation
copyright representative
person or organisation who represents the copyright for this person or work of art
person or organisation who represents the copyright for this person or work of art
Description | person or organisation who represents the copyright for this person | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Represents | copyright holder (Q29014674), performing rights organization (Q17004679) | ||||||||||||
Data type | Item | ||||||||||||
Domain | According to this template:
human or organisation
When possible, data should only be stored as statements | ||||||||||||
Usage notes | gebruikt om het aanspreekpunt van de rechten te administreren, gebruik 'erven' met bron voor als bekend is dat erven zelf rechten uitoefenen, gebruik 'vertegenwoordigt door CISAC' voor rechten van visuele werken bij collectieve. | ||||||||||||
Example | Anne Frank (Q4583) → Anne Frank Fund (Q565286) Piet Mondrian (Q151803) → Mondrian/Holtzman Trust (Q29902840) Pablo Picasso (Q5593) → reproduction right represented by CISAC-member (Q71528227) Claude Cahun (Q219634) → untraceable copyright owner (Q60711924) | ||||||||||||
See also | copyright holder (P3931), represented by (P1875), public domain date (P3893), copyright status (P6216) | ||||||||||||
Lists |
| ||||||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
Current uses |
| ||||||||||||
Search for values |
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Value type “natural person (Q154954), juridical person (Q155076), type of copyright management (Q78514488), copyright collective (Q1047437), copyright holding organisation (Q73278267), cultural institution (Q3152824)”: This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31), subclass of (P279) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value natural person (Q154954), juridical person (Q155076), type of copyright management (Q78514488), copyright collective (Q1047437), copyright holding organisation (Q73278267), cultural institution (Q3152824) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6275#Value type Q154954, Q155076, Q78514488, Q1047437, Q73278267, Q3152824, SPARQL
Type “legal person (Q3778211), cultural institution (Q3152824)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “legal person (Q3778211), cultural institution (Q3152824)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6275#Type Q3778211, Q3152824, SPARQL
heirs (Q29902355) is not a valid value[edit]
@Hannolans:The values of this property are specific legal persons and heirs (Q29902355) is not a specific legal person. If two people have the same copyright representative (P6275)-value, they are supposed to be owned by the same copyright holder. That assumption is broken when you enter values like heirs (Q29902355). You would need an item like "heirs of XY". ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 10:03, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- many museums use 'heirs'. we could create an item for every artist but that would mean we will end up with 100000s of heirs-items that are not persons but an unknown configuration of family members. We also have 'anonymous' and 'unknown' as creators, we don't create items 'unknown creator of ...'. Heirs could be the same concept in my opinion. It gives some important information without creating those items. --Hannolans (talk) 10:10, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Ha in this siituation of Naum Gabo (Q309482) I admit you are right, it was not stated as 'heirs' but as 'Nina & Graham Williams'. So that are individuals and we could create items for them. --Hannolans (talk) 11:01, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Wikidata has a very different data-model then a museum who basically models their data as strings. Wikidata actually has a sane ontology that distinguishes a legal person from a class of legal persons.
- When it comes to unknown creators, there's "unknown value" in the Wikidata model. You could use "unknown value" for heirs with the qualifier object has role (P3831) heirs (Q29902355). ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 19:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- currently for unknown creators we use anonymous (Q4233718) and there is also a discussion between 'unknown' and 'anonymous' we have to solve. That is also the case for heirs as there identity might be known by the museum but not disclosed because of privacy. --Hannolans (talk) 08:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)