Property talk:P8514

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

TOPCMB ID
unique identifier for a entity Tesauro de Objetos do Patrimônio Cultural nos Museus Brasileiros website
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8514#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8514#Single value, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8514#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8514#Scope, SPARQL

please be stricter with TOPCMB items[edit]

Pinged at https://t.me/c/1224298920/67780

  • You created clothes line (Q107194197) described as "kind of clothes line (Q1432810)".
    • In English, it's not possible for "clothes line" and "clothesline" to describe two different things.
    • Also, you don't describe what is the difference between them. Claiming that one is a subkind of the other doesn't explain what's the difference.

Just because two items exist in TOPCMB, does not mean that you necessarily have to create two items in WD.

  • The query https://w.wiki/4QfA returns all items with TOPCMB but then please sort by "itemLabel" to look for duplicates

This creates problems eg for Nomenclature for Museum Cataloging (P7749), which is another comprehensive object thesaurus and lists many of the same objects.

  • If you examine its Unique value violations, you'll see that some amount of doubled WD items are created from TOPCMB entries.

More problems:

Please merge some of these items, and remove higher-level abstract items that don't belong to WD. If needed, we can remove the "single value" constraint from TOPCMB ID (P8514) so you can list all their entries for the same WD item.

Cheers! --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vladimir Alexiev. As Marília left the WMB professional team and, I think, she is not much active in the wiki universe using her personal account, I ask you to forward these questions to me, User:Sturm. This is my personal account, I am one of the founding members of the WMB. Thanks for the notes. I will proceed with the merges. Regards, Sturm (talk) 17:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sturm Thanks for the quick response! I added several more bullets above, and a query that returns all TOPCMB items. Moved the entire discussion to this prop page so we can continue it here. Cheers! --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 17:36, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, @Vladimir Alexiev: We are starting the review process. It will take some time to verify and fix whatever went wrong, but in the mean time, please feel free and encouraged to merge or delete any error or item you find fit. Good contributions, EPorto (WMB) (talk) 18:28, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]