Talk:Q1419226
Autodescription — Historical Commission of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences (Q1419226)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Historical Commission of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
Generic queries for organizations
This section is generated using {{TP organization}}
- List of organizations which have Historical Commission of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences as parent organization (P749) (query)
- List of organizations of which Historical Commission of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences is a subsidiary (P355) (query)
- Queries based on employer (P108)
- Queries based on member of (P463)
- See also: WikiProject Organizations
- See also EntitySchema for organizations: E98
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
GND imported from this[edit]
As of now 8279 GND ID (P227) values are referenced with imported from Wikimedia project (P143)Historical Commission of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences (Q1419226) (https://w.wiki/8fFW), which is problematic for two reasons: firstly Historical Commission of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences (Q1419226) is obviously not a Wikimedia project, so P143 should be substituted by stated in (P248); secondly it Historical Commission of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences (Q1419226) is a commission (thus an organization), whilst stated in (P248) requires as value a publication/database ... and it's unclear to me which database curated by this commission was used to add these references, which were imported in 2015 by @Gymel: (example edit). Is there any hint about the database used? Otherwise, should we just remove these references? FYI @Kolja21, Emu:. Thanks --Epìdosis 14:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- The mislabeled import dates from 2015. I usually delete this reference after I have checked an entry. --Kolja21 (talk) 14:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Removal of those references is an option – but do they cause problems at the moment? --Emu (talk) 16:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- The only real problem is the constraint violation on P143. The other issue (not exactly a problem) is that it's not fully clear how exactly this commission provided these IDs (i.e. it is not exactly clear what these references stand for). --Epìdosis 18:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)