Talk:Q16722960

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

same or any difference? d1g (talk) 21:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

see phenomenon (Q483247) d1g (talk) 21:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removed subclass-of entity[edit]

I don't think this needs to have instances? Having it be a subclass of entity just makes it too easy to confuse it with phenomenon (Q483247). JesseW (talk) 01:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having superclass doesn't acquire having any instance. Both items are really inter-confusing. --Infovarius (talk) 19:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Did you mean "doesn't require"? Assuming that, I agree in theory, but up near the top of the hierarchy, I don't think there's a need to clutter the direct subclasses of "entity" with things that don't (like this item). In any case, thanks for the reply. JesseW (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, require, sorry for bad English I suppose that there is no necessity to clear hierarchy of entity very thoroughly - Wikidata reflects real world (and scientific point of view in addition) so there can't be an ideal. --Infovarius (talk) 19:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I just wanted to make sure I understood you right. JesseW (talk) 00:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]