Talk:Q168565
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — ghost station (Q168565)
description: Disused train stations
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “ghost station” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- ghost station (Q168565)
- railway station (Q55488)
- rail transport station (Q124673697)
- operating control point (Q97987466)
- station (Q12819564) (@)→
- →(#+) railway facility (Q800279)
- →(##) public transport stop (Q548662)
- underground station (Q22808403)
- subterranea (Q863404)
- space (Q2133296)
- →(@) station (Q12819564)
- subterranea (Q863404)
- railway station (Q55488)
- ghost station (Q168565)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
ghost station⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
I guess the intension was to say that it is either a closed train station OR metro station. But the two statements:
"subclass of train station, subclass of metro station"
don't mean that. They mean that is is both a train station AND a metro station.
So an train station marked with both train station and ghost station turned up in a query for metro stations! (e.g. Q30308634 until recently) Is there a way to make an "OR" statement? If not, ghost stations should only be metro stations, I guess. (15:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC))
Even now, Q3096750 shows up in a query for metro stations, when it was clearly not a metro station. (Petfold (talk) 15:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC))