Talk:Q1988927

Confusion

There are two Wikipedia articles for this entity (Indonesian and Ukrainian). Ukrainian one is closely related to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_public_access_catalog but intentionally differentiated from that (See https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPAC#%D0%92%D1%96%D0%B4%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%96%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_OPAC_%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B4_%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%96%D0%B2 ). Indonesian one is a kind of marketing media. Japanese Label デジタルカタログ also denote that. Therefore, this entity should be separated but I don't know other labels denote which concept (or yet another concept), so I just leave this comment here. --KAMEDA, Akihiro (talk) 05:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Beginning of the Ukrainian article is also about product catalog. And, even in English, this kind of ambiguity exists (Google :"digital catalog" marketing). So, the ideal solution would be:

- Create a new Ukrainian article ( Електронний_каталог_(Бібліотека) or such ) and move the corresponding description.

- TDKIV term ID: 000001436 is of that new entity.

- Purify this entity (Q1988927) as product catalog in digital form (subclass of (P279) edition of commercial catalogue (Q55089312))

But I don't speak Ukrainian and don't know the difference between Електро́нний катало́г and Електронний каталог so I can't create new Ukrainian article for this disambiguation.

--KAMEDA, Akihiro (talk) 03:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

don't know the difference between Електро́нний катало́г and Електронний каталог – there’s no difference, except that the former (as the first mention of the article title) contains stress marks. (When the second definition was initially added, the two were exactly the same, the stress marks were only added later.) —Tacsipacsi (talk) 12:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)