Talk:Q201038
Autodescription — Roman Kingdom (Q201038)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Roman Kingdom” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
Roman Kingdom
⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
sovereign state[edit]
Roman Kingdom (Q201038) was not a sovereign state (Q3624078), but a period in the history of Ancient Rome (Q1747689). It is like saying that the First Spanish Republic (Q497777) or the Middle Kingdom of Egypt (Q191324) were sovereign state (Q3624078). Ancient Rome (Q1747689) was a sovereign state (Q3624078).--Romulanus (talk) 10:06, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
[Alert]: Terns Disambiguation[edit]
Dear @Sapphorain and dear all, please, note that this entity rappresents the period of time when the Roman civilization was settled as a monarchy. Often this period is called Roman Kingdom in English, with some knows aliases as Rome of Kings or Regal Period. In my opinion that's pretty clear as the related page in English is wikipedia:Roman Kingdom, whose content is self-explanatory, as the entity is 'instance of "time period", and so on. Also, without being part of Ancent rome, to be intended as the Roman civilization era, neither the city, nor the state, is unclear why entity next relative is Republican rome, who is the period between the seven Kings and the 31 B.C.. I'm rebuilding some wikipedia pages related to roman legions, dumping all tabular stuff to wikidata to rewrite infoboxes as backed on here. Era of rome location (kingdom, republican, impero) is something pretty basic. By the way, I wrote this not to flame on, but to make people mind to check the IDs of foreign properties, use queries on related data and wikipedia stuff, as in this case is needed to read data properly.--T3kK4m (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)