Talk:Q29182
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — bishop (Q29182)
description: ordained or consecrated member of the Christian clergy
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “bishop” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- bishop (Q29182)
- Christian minister (Q1423891) (@)→
- ordinary (Q1638918)
- head of a diocese (Q112074151)
- →(¶) position (Q4164871)
- →(§) presbyter (Q831474)
- pastor (Q352507)
- →(⁋) priest (Q42603)
- →(#) cleric (Q2259532)
- →(⁋) priest (Q42603)
- bishop (Q29182)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
bishop⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- Generic queries for awards
This section is generated using {{TP award}}. It is designed for all items of class award (Q618779).
- Count (query) - List of award winners (query)
- Count by instance of (P31) (query)
- List of award winners by date (query)
- Queries for distinctions awarded to humans
- See also : WikiProject Award
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Should this be an acceptable occupation (P106)? Logically, it seems a bishop is a position held (P39), where the occupation would be priest (Q42603). Thoughts? Ijon (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with you. It's not occupation (Q12737077). --Infovarius (talk) 13:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- So it seems that we should convert these 4208 values to these 12539... @12akd, Brams:? --Infovarius (talk) 13:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- @12akd, Brams, Infovarius:. I don't understand the logic behind this decision. How can one say that being a priest is an occupation, but being a bishop isn't? It seems arbitrary to me. SJK (talk) 10:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)