Talk:Q3243461
Autodescription — collector (Q3243461)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “collector” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
collector⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- Generic queries for position
This section is generated using {{Generic queries for positions}}
- List of people holding the position, sorted by starting date (query)
- List of people and their ID's on other systems (query)
- Number of people having hold this position by gender (query) – List of people having hold this position with gender (query)
- Number of people having hold the position by country of citizenship (query) – List of people having hold the position by country of citizenship (query)
- People having hold the function by length of term (query)
- List of people having hold the position by total duration in the position (query)
- List of people having hold the position by gender at the starting date (query)
- List of people holding the function with employer as qualifier (query)
- List of people having hold the position as qualifier of employer (P108) (query)
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
At the MOBILISE Wikidata Workshop on 2020-02-13 we had significant discussion about use of "collector" (this item) as the occupation of collectors of biological specimens. However, the current subclass statement for the collector item, "subclass of artist" does not make sense. That statement does have the qualifier "often" but that seems questionable given that many people collect a variety of things that are not related to art.
Unless there are objections, I propose to delete this statement as inappropriate. Baskaufs (talk) 10:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
No additional discussion took place on this issue, so I have taken the proposed action of removing the subclass statement. Since the original proposal, an additional subclass statement was made. It is also inappropriate, since a subclass statement entails that all instances of the subject class are also instances of the object class. It is incorrect to say that all instances of "collectors" are hobbyists. Many collectors are professionals, therefore the assertion is not appropriate. Baskaufs (talk) 19:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)