Talk:Q33196656

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

@MSGJ: I reverted your changes to this object. You can not have light properties (light characteristic (P1030), light sector (P3922), lighthouse range (P2929) and focal height (P2923)) in a different object than the light identifiers (Admiralty number (P3562), NGA lighthouse ID (P3563), MarineTraffic Lighthouse ID (P3601) and Online List of Lights ID (P3223)). /ℇsquilo 09:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Esquilo: as far as I know, Admiralty number (P3562), NGA lighthouse ID (P3563), MarineTraffic Lighthouse ID (P3601) and Online List of Lights ID (P3223) are identifiers of the lighthouse not the light. In this case there are two different lights so it seems to make sense to split into different items to avoid excessive use of "applies to part" qualifiers. I'm happy to discuss it further but now the infobox on en:Understen is a complete mess! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In any case you reverted too far back, which I have now corrected. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:41, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, but I am not sure the coordinates are correct. Anyhow, Admiralty number (P3562) usually refers to the building, but NGA lighthouse ID (P3563) refers to the light. That is why Finnklipporna lower light (Q41774141) has two NGA-id's but only one Admirality id. It is commonplace in light lists to list main and axiliary light in the same post. I don't think en:Understen looks too bad. What makes it a bit messy is that ranges are output in nautical miles, US miles and kilometers at the same time. /ℇsquilo 17:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]