Talk:Q383092
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — art school (Q383092)
description: educational institution with a primary focus on the visual arts
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “art school” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- art school (Q383092)
- arts educational institution (Q1792623)
- academy (Q162633)
- academic institution (Q4671277)
- higher education institution (Q38723)
- learned society (Q955824)
- voluntary association (Q48204)
- advocacy group (Q431603)
- membership organization (Q6815100)
- →(◊) scientific organization (Q16519632)
- →(‡) school (Q3914)
- art school (Q383092)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
art school⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
@Hjart: Olá! Por que art school (Q383092) tem de ter a declaração "subclass of (P279): academy (Q162633)"? Você reverteu sem qualquer explicação no sumário de edição. Saudações, --Luan (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Because art school (Q383092) is a special type of academy (Q162633). In my language (danish) the first is called "kunstakademi" (english: "art academy"), while the second is just "akademi" (english "academy"), so to me declaring one a subclass of the other makes perfect sense. --Hjart (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Entendo. Talvez seja o caso de usar qualificadores como valid in place (P3005), applies to part (P518) ou outro do tipo… --Luan (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Using those qualifiers here, doesn't make much sense to me. Exactly why would you do that? --Hjart (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- A questão é que há art school (Q383092) que não é necessariamente uma academy (Q162633). O que me lembrou outra propriedade, a "has part(s) of the class (P2670)". --Luan (talk) 15:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Using those qualifiers here, doesn't make much sense to me. Exactly why would you do that? --Hjart (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Entendo. Talvez seja o caso de usar qualificadores como valid in place (P3005), applies to part (P518) ou outro do tipo… --Luan (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)