Talk:Q42727519
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — item/value with less precision and/or accuracy (Q42727519)
description: Wikibase reason for deprecated rank
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “item/value with less precision and/or accuracy” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
item/value with less precision and/or accuracy⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Clarification[edit]
Subclass of entity[edit]
Every class is by definition a subclass of entity (Q35120), but in order to keep the class tree structure manageable, only very few class items in Wikidata (listed in Property:P279#P2302) should be directly declared subclass of (P279) entity (Q35120). Other class items should be declared subclass of (P279) their nearest higher superclass, which is a more precise value than entity (Q35120), and will eventually lead back to it. --SM5POR (talk) 09:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Vojtěch Dostál: since your edits, everywhere it is given as the reason for deprecated rank (P2241), it shows an error because it is not the class/subclass of {{Q|27949697]]. I see you have also deleted the descriptions. Couldn't this be sorted out somehow so that there are no error messages everywhere? There are over 18,000 items involved. Pallor (talk) 14:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Pallor This is actually correct, because item/value with less precision and/or accuracy (Q42727519) is not a proper value for reason for deprecated rank (P2241). But I am open to suggestions how to handle the situation Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Vojtěch Dostál: I accept this, but in this case it would be worth using a bot to remove this qualifier from all statements where it is used and set the obsolete rank to normal (I'm not saying that's you who have to do this, but a bot help request would be worth posting) Pallor (talk) 20:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Pallor Yeah, good ídea, but first I need to have a look at some of the use cases and see if we don't break something with this approach. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 07:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Vojtěch Dostál: I accept this, but in this case it would be worth using a bot to remove this qualifier from all statements where it is used and set the obsolete rank to normal (I'm not saying that's you who have to do this, but a bot help request would be worth posting) Pallor (talk) 20:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Pallor This is actually correct, because item/value with less precision and/or accuracy (Q42727519) is not a proper value for reason for deprecated rank (P2241). But I am open to suggestions how to handle the situation Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)