Talk:Q4936952
Autodescription — anatomical structure (Q4936952)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “anatomical structure” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
anatomical structure⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Additional Documentation[edit]
Subclasses:
PREFIX gas: <http://www.bigdata.com/rdf/gas#>
SELECT ?item ?itemLabel ?linkTo {
SERVICE gas:service {
gas:program gas:gasClass "com.bigdata.rdf.graph.analytics.SSSP" ;
gas:in wd:Q4936952 ;
gas:traversalDirection "Reverse" ;
gas:out ?item ;
gas:out1 ?depth ;
gas:maxIterations 2 ;
gas:linkType wdt:P279 .
}
OPTIONAL { ?item wdt:P279 ?linkTo }
SERVICE wikibase:label {bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en" }
}
Description[edit]
"entity with a single connected inherent 3D shape that's created by coordinated expression of the organism's own DNA": skin (Q1074) is anatomical structure (Q4936952)? --Fractaler (talk) 13:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm no anatomist, but that makes sense to me; I would even say that 'integument', which is a wider sense, would count. Arlo Barnes (talk) 05:34, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
How about "anatomical structure type" for english label[edit]
There are 1000s of subclasses of this item which are all wrong as far as I can tell
SELECT ?item ?itemLabel WHERE {
?item (wdt:P279)* wd:Q4936952
.
SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "[AUTO_LANGUAGE],en,en" }
}
LIMIT 10000
. Examples of items from the above query I think is wrong is:
I think this problem arises in part because the label is misleading. I think if we call it "anatomical structure type" things will be cleaner.
Notified participants of WikiProject Anatomy
WikiProject Molecular biology has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.
Iwan.Aucamp (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppositely, they are correct subclasses of "anatomical structure" and would be wrong for "a.s. type". They would be P31 of "type". --Infovarius (talk) 16:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)