Talk:Q582861

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Autodescription — Marinid dynasty (Q582861)

description: Muslim Berber dynasty (1244–1465)
Useful links:
Generic queries for administrative territorial entities

This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.

🌎 Geography 🌎

👥 People 👥

🎭 Arts and fictions 🎭


See also

WikiProject Morocco

Description en français[edit]

La description précédente n’avait aucun sens, visiblement du Google traduction. Je suis donc revenu à la version précédente
Cdlt,YusAtlas (talk) 02:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@M. Bitton: La remarque précédente va aussi pour vous. Merci de cesser ce POVP cette modif imprécise va à l’encontre du principe SVO de la langue française, cela n’a pas de sens. Ce type d’expression n’est pas recevable, le français ne marche pas comme l’anglais ou l’allemand. Laissez les locuteurs natifs se charger de cela. Bien à vous, YusAtlas (talk) 15:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good try, but it's blindingly obvious that this is nothing more than yet another attempt at pushing the pov for which you were blocked just last week.
"Dynastie berbère musulmane" is perfectly adequate and so is "dynastie musulmane sunnite" (like what we have for the Hafsids) or "dynastie musulmane d'origine berbère". I don't care which of the three is adopted. M.Bitton (talk) 18:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@YusAtlas: which of the proposed three versions do you prefer? M.Bitton (talk) 18:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

« Dynastie musulmane d’origine berbère » is better YusAtlas (talk) 10:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done M.Bitton (talk) 16:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing flag[edit]

I've removed the unsourced flag from this entry, which has been discussed on the English Wikipedia article's talk page (here). There's no reason to be attaching flag images here as there's no definitive knowledge of what the flag looked like. (The map, on the other hand, comes from a reliable source, also discussed on the English Wikipedia page, so it should be good enough here.) R Prazeres (talk) 01:42, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]