Talk:Q7366
Autodescription — song (Q7366)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “song” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- song (Q7366)
- lyrico-musical work (Q114586269)
- vocal music (Q685884)
- poetry (Q482)
- song (Q7366)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
song⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
I see that P279(P31):Q207628 was repeatedly added and removed by various users in the past. I add it again, as it make sense for me (and removing some constraint violations). Before removing please discuss here first. --Jklamo (talk) 06:28, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
I would like to remove this statement. 'Literary work' item is a subclass of written work (Q47461344) and is being used for mostly written works, but this item is used for sounds, which is different. Currenlty 'song' is instance of (P31) literary form (Q4263830), and probably it is enough to state it relates to literature. For those songs which are associated with text instead of sound, 'instance of literary work' + 'literary form = song' can be used. 'Subclass of literary work' is being hugely overused, there are almost 3000 subclasses, and 'song' has 572. 'Song' inherits some properties from 'lit.work', but useful ones are also inherited from musical work (Q2188189).
- These are other top-level subclasses of literary work: Wikidata GraphBuilder