Talk:Q811979
Autodescription — architectural structure (Q811979)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “architectural structure” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
architectural structure⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
| Property | Data type | description | required |
|---|---|---|---|
| architect (P84) | Item | person or architectural firm responsible for designing this building | yes |
| coordinate location (P625) | Geographic coordinates | geocoordinates of the subject. For Earth, please note that only WGS84 coordinating system is supported at the moment | yes |
| located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) | Item | the item is located on the territory of the following administrative entity. Use P276 for specifying locations that are non-administrative places and for items about events. Use P1382 if the item falls only partially into the administrative entity. | yes |
| located on street (P669) | Item | street, road, or square, where the item is located. To add the number, use Property:P670 "house number" as qualifier. Use property P6375 "street address", if there is no item for the street | yes |
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
classification as location[edit]
Is an architectural structure localizable or a place, or is it located somewhere and can be moved ? As the time I write these lines, there is two classes for location as superclasses : geographical feature (Q618123) and geographic location (Q2221906) (labelled identically in french). Is this really a good idea ? TomT0m (talk) 15:05, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
what is an architectural structure[edit]
My view is that an architectural structure is something to be considered more or less as a whole, i.e., a building or a tower or maybe even a compound, and not something that is generally considered as part of some other structure, i.e., not a window or a door. Windows or doors are architectural elements instead. I suppose that a particular window could be an architectural structure if it was erected in some place, but then it would be a whole, and certainly not a typical window. I'm likely going to reclassify windows and doors and other architectural elements if there are no good reasons put forward to not do so. Peter F. Patel-Schneider (talk) 20:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)