Talk:Q845214
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — biota (Q845214)
description: plants, animals, fungi and microorganisms of a region
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “biota” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
biota⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Instance or subclass[edit]
@Eulenspiegel1: I don't think my cat is an instance of Q845214 (now it is inherited also that she is Biota (Q2382443) which is nonsense). You added that this is group of organisms (which I almost agree) so the cat is a part of it. Moreover I see an instance like Biota of Tokyo Imperial Palace (Q4915320) which is a group of organism so why not to have
? --Infovarius (talk) 16:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Only flora and fauna?[edit]
@Zhenqinli: are bacteria or protista a flora or a fauna? Mushrooms? Infovarius (talk) 08:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- This item has been described as "plant and animal life of a region" in English since 2019.
- No specialized vocabulary (at the same level of flora or fauna) seems to have emerged to describe biota of bacteria, protista or mushroom; few literature can be found. --Zhenqinli (talk) 13:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. English Wikipedia says that it's "Microbiota" which "include bacteria, archaea, protists, fungi, and viruses". I think macroscopic funguses are sometimes included in the flora concept and that's why Merriam-Webster online dictionary and biology online dictionnary talk only about fauna and flora for biota. But their is the new concept of funga for funguses that seems to be included in biota. --Harmonizator (talk) 09:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- So we will make "biota" and "microbiota" the opposites? --Infovarius (talk) 12:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- mycobiota (Q1474267) seems to be a new term used to describe biota of fungi specifically, though not yet used widely. --Zhenqinli (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. English Wikipedia says that it's "Microbiota" which "include bacteria, archaea, protists, fungi, and viruses". I think macroscopic funguses are sometimes included in the flora concept and that's why Merriam-Webster online dictionary and biology online dictionnary talk only about fauna and flora for biota. But their is the new concept of funga for funguses that seems to be included in biota. --Harmonizator (talk) 09:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)