Wikidata:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/Archive/2013/04

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Go comment! --Rschen7754 21:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Flag for CennoBot

I have just approved Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/CennoBot. If one of you could please flag User:CennoBot. Thanks! Legoktm (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done Vogone talk 20:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Krdbot approved

I have approved Krdbot, please give them the flag. Thanks in advance.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done[1] Regards, Vogone talk 19:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

EmausBot approved

Please could you send a flag in User:EmausBots direction (Special:UserRights/EmausBot)? ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 11:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done Legoktm (talk) 12:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! --Emaus (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Legoktm is approved as a bureaucrat. Let's give him a right. Thanks --Stryn (talk) 11:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done Vogone talk 14:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

2013-04-20 – لا روسا → ولاء عبد المنعم

✓ Done Legoktm (talk) 23:23, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for removal of botflag

Technical difficulties. Sorry :/ Hurricanefan25 in the storm (talk) 11:38, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done -- Bene* talk 11:44, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

2013-04-23 – Kirikou → Akiry

✓ Done Legoktm (talk) 19:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Please note that I closed this one two days ahead; if any of the crats disagrees feel free to reopen.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm not really a fan of early clusures as the candidates are responsible for their own requests. If they feel they have no chance, they can withdraw. But this is just my personal opinion so, that I'm okay with others doing it. Regards, Vogone talk 11:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Vogone pretty much summed up my thoughts. Legoktm (talk) 02:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
And I agree with those thoughts too.  Hazard-SJ  ✈  02:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
And I, too. --Ricordisamoa 10:10, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

John F. Lewis' candidacy

Can an crat please close John F. Lewis admin candidacy? 15 hours have passed since the RfA period elapsed. Thanks. — ΛΧΣ21 15:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done Legoktm (talk) 18:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Congratulations! You just violated a recently approved guideline. Completely unneeded, in my opinion since we have a third, and in a few hours also our fourth bureaucrat. I'm not that happy with this situation but it is indeed your decision, when and how to violate community approved guidelines. Regards, Vogone talk 18:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I actually voted, so that my promotion (if it occurs) is not going to change anything in this case. I think it is only Bene*, and this is actually why I thought we need more bureaucrats.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure also Bene* would've done it. Regards, Vogone talk 18:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps in future, no crats should participate in discussions where they are expected to promote. Advanced permissions and rights removal (excluding sysop) could have bureaucrat participation so we can avoid a situation similar to this in future. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)