Wikidata:Property proposal/Basketball Bundesliga Teams UUID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Basketball Bundesliga Teams UUID[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Sports
Withdrawn
| Description | UUID squadra della Basketball Bundesliga (it) / Basketball Bundesliga Teams UUID (de) – (Please translate this into English.) |
|---|---|
| Represents | Basketball Bundesliga (Q540636) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | basketball team (Q13393265) |
| Allowed values | \b[0-9a-f]{8}\b-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-\b[0-9a-f]{12}\b |
| Example 1 | Ratiopharm Ulm (Q266588) →aa1d6b4a-27de-4cfd-a765-eae32dc5e83b |
| Example 2 | Alba Berlin (Q643795)→87d95bed-ebd2-4e79-8a13-e37efda4677c |
| Example 3 | Hamburg Towers (Q17324838)→0fc7f654-fd68-456f-b28e-f06ab96d1bc4 |
| Source | https://www.easycredit-bbl.de/statistiken/teams |
| Number of IDs in source | 50 |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| Formatter URL | https://www.easycredit-bbl.de/teams/$1 |
| See also | Basketball Bundesliga UUID (P10658) |
Motivation[edit]
Site of the top division of German professional men's basketball league. Property:P10658 is the UUID for players. On the website there is another UUID for teams. --Looniverse (talk) 06:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support Since there is already a property for the players Basketball Bundesliga UUID (P10658), I find the analogue for the team useful. I point out, however, that the last example does not refer to the team, but to the league season of a team. Furthermore, it does not respect the URL formatter. Please consider changing it. Thanks --Luca.favorido (talk) 16:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice. I have corrected it. --Looniverse (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Sports
Oppose. Only 50 IDs in the database is almost nothing, I suggest using described at URL (P973) for now. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 22:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- The property already exists for players. The corresponding feature on this database is the link to the teams. For reasons of clarity, consistency and uniformity, this property should also be present. 05:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Looniverse (talk) 05:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I understand that, however only 50 identifiers is not really enough for justifying a new property on Wikidata, at least I, as the property creator, would not consider creating such a property until there are at least more than 200 IDs in the database. Just so you understand, I was recently meant to propose a property for the game franchises found in this database, but quickly changed my mind as there are only 24 identifiers, which is clearly not enough for a separate property, so I'll wait until the database is filled with new identifiers and use described at URL in the meantime, which is what I recommended to do in our case. There is nothing wrong with that. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 01:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Kirilloparma, I added described at URL (P973) to the team-items. I didn't count, I think there are actually 30 to 40 teams connected to the database. So it's okay for me. What are the next steps? Should I withdraw the proposal: how to do this? Best regards Looniverse (talk) 13:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Looniverse: Thank you. Yes, you can withdraw this proposal on your own by setting template parameter
| status = withdrawnand adding* {{withdrawn}} ~~~~at the end of the proposal. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Looniverse: Thank you. Yes, you can withdraw this proposal on your own by setting template parameter
- Hi Kirilloparma, I added described at URL (P973) to the team-items. I didn't count, I think there are actually 30 to 40 teams connected to the database. So it's okay for me. What are the next steps? Should I withdraw the proposal: how to do this? Best regards Looniverse (talk) 13:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I understand that, however only 50 identifiers is not really enough for justifying a new property on Wikidata, at least I, as the property creator, would not consider creating such a property until there are at least more than 200 IDs in the database. Just so you understand, I was recently meant to propose a property for the game franchises found in this database, but quickly changed my mind as there are only 24 identifiers, which is clearly not enough for a separate property, so I'll wait until the database is filled with new identifiers and use described at URL in the meantime, which is what I recommended to do in our case. There is nothing wrong with that. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 01:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn Looniverse (talk) 06:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
