Wikidata:Property proposal/Business valuation
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Valuation[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
Withdrawn
| Description | Business valuation |
|---|---|
| Represents | business valuation (Q1322967) |
| Data type | Number (not available yet) |
| Domain | item, types of items that may bear this property: various items that are instances of business (Q4830453), corporation (Q167037), public company (Q891723), etc. |
| Allowed values | number |
| Allowed units | Currencies of valuation (oftentimes USD) |
| Example 1 | OpenSea (Q106650129) → 13,300,000 at the point in time 2022-01-04, per the source cited here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OpenSea&oldid=1064000235#cite_note-10 |
| Example 2 | X (Q918) → 1,000,000 USD at the point in time 2009-03, per the source: https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/twitter-to-become-techs-newest-1-billion-company/ |
| Example 3 | X (Q918) → 3,700,000 USD at the point in time 2010-12, per the source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703716904576134543029279426 |
| Example 4 | X (Q918) → 8,400,000 USD at the point in time 2011-12, per the source: https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/12/19/saudi-prince-invests-300-million-in-twitter/ |
| Planned use | Add valuations to companies that I see sourced in Wikipedia. E.g. w:en:OpenSea has a sourced valuation at a point in time. |
| See also |
Motivation[edit]
This is an empirical, precise piece of data for a company that can be charted and graphed over time as it changes or compared to other such companies and is useful for some statistical comparisons. Seems not to have been proposed. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Comment We do have market capitalization (P2226); is this intended as an equivalent for non-publicly traded companies? Could we just broaden P2226? ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith: Market capitalization is only relevant to publicly-traded companies, but ones that are privately held wouldn't have this. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- For that we have estimated value (P8340) (which I proposed a while ago) so I
Oppose this proposal Germartin1 (talk) 08:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- For that we have estimated value (P8340) (which I proposed a while ago) so I
- Oppose estimated value (P8340) can do. --- Jura 10:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn as redundant. A good faith search did not show it, but there is an existing property that is sufficient. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)