Wikidata:Property proposal/CODEPAC-Bauru ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
CODEPAC-Bauru ID[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Not done
| Description | unique identifier for a classified good of the Brazilian city of Bauru, São Paulo by its Council for the Defense of Cultural Heritage |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Allowed values | \d+ |
| Example 1 | Tenrikyo Church of Dendotyo (Q84332192) → 26 |
| Example 2 | Quartel da Policia Militar do Estado de São Paulo Building (Q84332177) → 31 |
| Example 3 | Frontispiece of the Cemetery of Saudade (Q84332174) → 29 |
| Source | https://sites.bauru.sp.gov.br/codepac/bens_tombados.aspx |
| Planned use | all the Bauru items classified by this database |
| Number of IDs in source | 44 |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
| Formatter URL | https://sites.bauru.sp.gov.br/codepac/bem_detalhes.aspx?id=$1 |
Motivation[edit]
This is an official website of the municipality that lists and describes its history and aspects of the monuments and historical buildings presents there and preserved by the city. Ederporto (talk) 04:25, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support --GiFontenelle (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose: not enough IDs. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 19:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC).
- @Nomen ad hoc: Hello! I know there are few ids, but this is an official website that lists and describes all monuments and buildings preserved by the city of Bauru, I'm sure that I saw exceptions on cases like this before with external identifiers, particularly with small databases for cultural preserved items. Besides that, one of the items is the whole collection of the Museu Ferroviário Regional de Bauru (Q56694455) (this is the item for it), that have 667 artworks, all of them relevant for Wikidata and the city (e.g. indigenous objects from the colonization), so the identifier would be used in all of them as well, as they are part of the Museu Ferroviário Regional collection (Q84332190). I ask you to reconsider. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 04:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Ederporto, GiFontenelle, Nomen ad hoc:
Not done, as there are not enough IDs. Thierry Caro (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
