Wikidata:Property proposal/Ident.Nr.
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ident.No.[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Not done
| Description | identifier for artworks in the collection of the state museums of Berlin |
|---|---|
| Represents | Der Jungbrunnen (Q20828882) => Ident.Nr. 593; Pergamonaltar (Q158058) => Ident.Nr. Pe. 1 und viele weitere mehr |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Example 1 | Senmurv-Platte => Ident.Nr. I. 4926 |
| Example 2 | The fountain of youth (Q20828882) → Ident.Nr. 593 |
| Example 3 | Pergamon Altar (Q158058) → Ident.Nr. Pe. 1 |
| See also | inventory number (P217) |
Motivation[edit]
the Ident.Nr. is an unique identification of artwork within the IT systems of the Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin - Preußischer KulturbesitzM1fischer14 (talk) 08:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support David (talk) 06:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment inventory number (P217) is generally used for this. --- Jura 17:31, 29 June 2019 (UTC)- Comment Either use inventory number (P217) or the label on this identifier needs to be much more specific (for example "Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin ID"). About how many artworks are in the collection and have these identifiers? ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Agree that the name needs to be a lot more specific. --Ysangkok (talk) 19:33, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Some items have really weird Ident.Nr., like e.g. this Bluse. What is the value of having the Ident.Nr if the museum doesn't actually use it itself for indexing? As you can see, the URL's do not reference it. It's called a Nummer, but is not actually a number. How do they actually use the number in the museums? Because their IT departments don't seem to cherish the system... --Ysangkok (talk) 19:33, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if there is no formatter url/direct way of linking. --- Jura 23:52, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Conditional support @M1fischer14: There are arguments above, have you read them? Would you be kind enough to complete your proposal, please? You can help yourself with comments next to the lines to fill in or get inspired by other propositions. Otherwise the proposal may be badly received. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 03:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)- Support --Trade (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Cwf97 (talk) 19:50, 29 May 2020 (EST)
Oppose Close, no reactions from author for almost 1 year, comments by Eihel, ArthurPSmith and others not reflectedVojtěch Dostál (talk) 12:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done @Vojtěch Dostál: Agreed, I've closed it - @M1fischer14, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Jura1: @Ysangkok, Eihel, Trade, Cwf97: if any of you feel a property for this collection is still needed, please open a new request referencing this one, hopefully with a better name and a little more info. Thanks. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
