Wikidata:Property proposal/described in Wikimedia article
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
described in Wikimedia article[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Not done
| Description | The topic is described in the specific Wikimedia article in detail (not just mentioned). |
|---|---|
| Data type | URL |
| Domain | anything |
| Example 1 | Eastern Han (Q1147037) -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_dynasty#Eastern_Han |
| Example 2 | Hussein Onyango Obama (Q15982328) -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_Barack_Obama#Hussein_Onyango_Obama |
| Example 3 | place des Carmes (Q24834026) -> https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Places_d%27Avignon#Place_des_Carmes |
| Example 4 | Tengwar (Q473725) -> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tengwar_und_Certar#Tengwar |
| See also | glossary entry at Wikipedia URL (P5178) will be a subproperty |
Motivation[edit]
This provides a weak form of sitelinks. As page content may be non-persistent, we probably needs a qualifier to indicate a permanent version. GZWDer (talk) 04:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Comment @GZWDer: This is currently handled to some degree by sitelinks to redirects. Would you intend to replace those sitelinks (which require a workaround to create) with these statements? ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith: Sometimes they are red links (e.g. fr:Place des Carmes). Another example is en:Lupton family describes a number of people but no pages redirects to this page.--GZWDer (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Is there any reason for not using described at URL (P973) instead of creating an entirely new property? Other than that it's a great idea though, ever since not being able to create site links to redirects it's been harder to find whether Wikipedia contains any information on the item or not. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 01:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Looks to me like this is intended to explicitly point out the material is covered in wikipedia. That is, it's actually a kind of sub- or weak interwiki, not a generic URL. Circeus (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Oppose per Lewis Hulbert, use P973 is good enough, feel free to add this name as alias of that. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Not done No support.--Micru (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)