Wikidata:Property proposal/disinherited
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
has disinherited[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
| Description | someone who received or will receive no or little the subject's property or title even if otherwise eligible, (partially) the opposite of Wikidata:Property proposal/heir or beneficiary |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | people |
| Example 1 | Joan Crawford (Q40475) → Christina Crawford (Q523816) |
| Example 2 | Tony Curtis (Q162389) → Jamie Lee Curtis (Q106997) |
| Example 3 | Cornelius Vanderbilt II (Q2708289) → Cornelius Vanderbilt III (Q1875953) |
| Example 4 | Sir Evelyn Broughton, 12th Baronet (Q75260564) → Isabella Blow (Q1619607) |
GZWDer (talk) 13:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support Interesting relation, I do think this is useful to have here. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)- The property name should be more clear about the direction. "has disinherited" might be a way to go there. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 18:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- I was thinking more about it. Why isn't it a qualifier? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:57, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose This assumes very specific cultural context, specifically the background information that (and what) someone would normally have inherited. It could also be captured with a property such as “bequeathed” taking a list of properties or titles or whatever, and “no value” for this specific case.Karl Oblique (talk) 06:27, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Neutral Argued with this decision, very good examples, but not significantly or particularly being helpful, but not cause any sign of being useless. Solaris5296 (talk) 02:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)- @GZWDer, ArthurPSmith, ChristianKl, Karl Oblique, Solaris5296:,
Not done, no consensus of proposed property at this time based on the above discussion. Also, didn't response ChristianKl's comments. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
