Wikidata:Property proposal/is not part of

is not part of

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Not done

Description	object of which the subject is not a part
Data type	Item
Example 1	hermit (Q189829)is not part ofsociety (Q8425)
Example 2	President of Russia (Q218295)is not part ofGovernment of Russia (Q1140115) (stated in (P248)Constitution of Russia (Q652062))
Example 3	one-shot (Q933530)is not part ofcomic book series (Q14406742)
Example 4	Isle of Man (Q9676)is not part ofUnited Kingdom (Q145)

Motivation

The negated property of part of (P361). --Push-f (talk) 02:42, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Suggested English aliases:

• isn't part of
• isn't a part of
• is not a part of
• not part of
• not a part of

Discussion

•  Support -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 03:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment This should be clarified to only be applicable to common misconceptions. If not, almost every item would qualify to all of the examples. However, I'm not sure this is a good idea for a property. If created, it really should have constraints requiring a source or else we will probably get an inflation of usage of it. Ainali (talk) 15:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose: extremely vague and open-ended. While it is true that Isle of Man (Q9676) is not part of United Kingdom (Q145), it is equally true that it is not part Galapagos Islands (Q38095) or the Antilles (Q166131), or Nigeria (Q1033), and is also not part of Backstreet Boys (Q17140) or The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (Q326914) or history of Los Angeles (Q3136743) or motor car (Q1420) or Rodgers and Hammerstein (Q1275079) or a banana split (Q245752) or .... There is no lear benefit to listing every thing something is not, even if somethings occasionally get mistaken for membership. If modeled anywhere, widespread misconceptions might be better indicated by using deprecated statements of part of (P361) (with a reference) or deprecated has part(s) (P527) on the parent item. -Animalparty (talk) 03:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose: as per the user above, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 08:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Not done, no consensus of proposed property at this time based on the above discussion. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 04:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)