Wikidata:Property proposal/tartan image

‎tartan image

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Not done

Description	image of the item's tartan
Represents	tartan (Q216797)
Data type	Item
Example 1	Duke of Rothesay (Q1059510)→https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prince_of_Rothesay_tartan_(Vestiarium_Scoticum).png
Example 2	Clan Scott (Q913761)→https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scott_tartan_(Vestiarium_Scoticum).png
Example 3	Burberry (Q390107)→https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Burberry_pattern.svg
Source	https://www.tartanregister.gov.uk/index
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)

Motivation

A lot of organizations, clans, families, individuals have their own tartan. Tartans can be done the same way how coat of arms and flags are encoded into Wikidata.

Discussion

•  Oppose We should not repeat the same mistakes made with coat of arms properties. We can use the tartan item with P18: Duke of Rothesay (Q1059510)<tartan><tartan item>image (P18)File:Prince_of_Rothesay_tartan_(Vestiarium_Scoticum).png. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 21:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  • @Tinker Bell Can I ask what mistakes were made with the CoA properties? Jhowie Nitnek 18:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
    • I'm talking about redundancy: coat of arms image (P94) is redundant because the same relationship can be expressed by doing <item>coat of arms (P237)<item for CoA>image (P18). Having these extra properties make more difficult reusing data, because an user has to be aware of all of these ways to express data, instead of just one. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 21:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
      • @Tinker Bell Then you could say the same for flag image right? Jhowie Nitnek 20:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
        • @JhowieNitnek: Yes. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 20:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose in lieu of the item-based proposal, per Tinker Bell. Arlo Barnes (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Not done, not created per lack of support. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 06:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)