Wikidata:Requests for permissions/RfPropertyCreator/September 2013
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Contents
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Danrok
Danrok (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I'm nominating Danrok for property creator right (he has already accepted). Very active discusser of proposals since February and 25 k edits in total. --Tobias1984 (talk) 15:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Tobias1984 (talk) 15:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Done. --Stryn (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Fralambert
Fralambert (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I like to have the right to create properties for the purpose to create properties about cultural heritage identifier. I have already asked for Quebec cultural heritage directory ID (P633). I have also made some change in the constraints of Mérimée ID (P380) and Quebec cultural heritage directory ID (P633). --Fralambert (talk) 21:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- C'est fait--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Micru
Micru (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
I would like to join the property team and help creating the approved properties related to books and sources in general. Micru (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hhhm, you don't have many edits to property proposal pages, but I wouldn't oppose another admin granting it, and if no-one else gives concerns, I'll probably grant it myself.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:46, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not done As Jasper said you don't have many edits towards property proposal pages but I don't see that as a problem really. For this instance, I appreciate you proposing properties but I personally would like to see some discussion about others proposals and putting your view on them. If you do get more involved in discussion the I would have no problem giving you the right. If I overlooked your discussion of other properties by mistake feel free to bring them to my attention. John F. Lewis (talk) 07:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- I have been discussing properties mainly at Wikidata:Books task force and the Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/References_and_sources. My intended focus is those fields, so I don't think that commenting on properties of other fields is relevant in this case.--Micru (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- I still think being involved in the discussions that propose the properties is important for the right, so you show you're familiar with the process.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- I have been discussing properties mainly at Wikidata:Books task force and the Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/References_and_sources. My intended focus is those fields, so I don't think that commenting on properties of other fields is relevant in this case.--Micru (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not done As Jasper said you don't have many edits towards property proposal pages but I don't see that as a problem really. For this instance, I appreciate you proposing properties but I personally would like to see some discussion about others proposals and putting your view on them. If you do get more involved in discussion the I would have no problem giving you the right. If I overlooked your discussion of other properties by mistake feel free to bring them to my attention. John F. Lewis (talk) 07:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support - Looking at your recent activity Micru, I think it would be good to give you these rights. I would be glad if you could work property proposal/term into your routine because that page has the most properties and only very few people reviewing it. Can I still get a second opinion before I do it? --Tobias1984 (talk) 09:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- Done I have interpreted the absence of comments as a sign that nobody opposes this. --Tobias1984 (talk) 19:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
GZWDer
GZWDer (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
There are quite A LOT OF property proposals which is make several months ago and with consensus. such as this. I want to create these properties. GZWDer (talk) 11:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- I did not see any outstanding concerns. Granted.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Docu
Docu (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools) There seems to be a backlog of property needing to be created. Given that most properties I created turned out to be used fairly well and the proportional deletion rate isn't higher than those of others, I asked to be restored. -- Docu at 08:49, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Done--DangSunM (talk) 09:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Removed See removal reason and soon to be AN thread. Docu, please do not an ask admin to reinstate, if you want it reinstated immediately, contact me and only me. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC)