Shortcut: WD:AN

Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 140: Line 140:
: And [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Talk:Q556 this] „personal affair”. --[[User:Succu|Succu]] ([[User talk:Succu|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 22:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
: And [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Talk:Q556 this] „personal affair”. --[[User:Succu|Succu]] ([[User talk:Succu|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 22:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
::The user seems to like disrupting things. I've [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IP-80.134.90.212&diff=prev&oldid=209942442 posted a message] to his/her tp because of an IMO inappropriate username (because it resembles an IP address) and so I'll keep an eye on that for a possible reply. I have a bad feeling about this. --[[User:AmaryllisGardener|'''<span style="color:#E0115F">Amaryllis</span><span style="color:#74C365">Gardener</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:AmaryllisGardener|'''talk''']]</sup> 23:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
::The user seems to like disrupting things. I've [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IP-80.134.90.212&diff=prev&oldid=209942442 posted a message] to his/her tp because of an IMO inappropriate username (because it resembles an IP address) and so I'll keep an eye on that for a possible reply. I have a bad feeling about this. --[[User:AmaryllisGardener|'''<span style="color:#E0115F">Amaryllis</span><span style="color:#74C365">Gardener</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:AmaryllisGardener|'''talk''']]</sup> 23:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
:::Blocked [[User:IP-80.134.90.212|IP-80.134.90.212]], this person has plenty of usernames and a history of being abusive. [[User:Multichill|Multichill]] ([[User talk:Multichill|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
:::Had to do some digging, see [//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=10824984#Multiple_accounts.40wikidata] for more information. [[User:Multichill|Multichill]] ([[User talk:Multichill|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Bene*}} ^^ [[User:Multichill|Multichill]] ([[User talk:Multichill|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 11:12, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


== Good article status on English Wikipedia, trying to add the badge to Wikidata ==
== Good article status on English Wikipedia, trying to add the badge to Wikidata ==

Revision as of 11:13, 11 April 2015

Administrators' noticeboard
This is a noticeboard for matters requiring administrator attention. IRC channel: #wikidataconnect
On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2024/08.

Requests for deletions

high

~158 open requests for deletions.

Should we fully protect this like Project:Village pump (Q16503), as huwiki is archiving weekly by moving that page. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that someone can go to huwiki and see if a better archiving method can be used instead? --AmaryllisGardener talk 12:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I can see archiving is done daily rather than weekly. Does it create any problems apart from increasing the edit history? User:Vitorla is a trusted editor on huwiki, his edits are reliable. Of course, I can discuss alternative archiving methods with him if necessary. --Csigabi (talk) 10:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So let's ask @Vitorla: and @Tgr:. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why me? :-) Anyway, we'll look into alternatives. Can you explain how exactly this is problematic? Do you want to avoid the interwiki change, the history spam, something else? --Tgr (talk) 07:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion in huwiki: hu:Wikipédia:Wikidata-segítségkérés#Átnevezés és a Wikidata 95.116.217.226 22:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Karmela has created a soft redirect to the page, so from now on archiving will not create an issue. --Csigabi (talk) 09:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection requested

Edit war over Q258360. User:Borgatya is pushing his wrong version no matter what. Will someone revert it to the right version, protect the article and warn him? Thanks. --Csigabi (talk) 12:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per my closure of the previous thread here, I've blocked both @Borgatya: and @Laszlovszky_András:. This sort of needless fighting (over descriptions! who cares) adds nothing to this project and needs to stop here. If another admin feels that a week-long block time for edit warring is too much, please change it - I don't think I've ever blocked someone for that in the past. Ajraddatz (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I've looked over this a bit more and unblocked Laszlovszky András, who doesn't appear to have been involved in this dispute before now. Please don't edit war in cases like this - step back and discuss the issue, and raise it here if needed. Ajraddatz (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've just changed the block settings for Borgatya to prevent him from sending emails, after repeated harassment of me by him since the initial block. As always, another admin is free to review and change my action as desired. Ajraddatz (talk) 15:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ajraddatz: I feel like you should've left him a block notice on the talk page so he would then know better than to use email for an unblock appeal (the notice would let him know to use the template).--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What is the template for that? I'll add it right away. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ajraddatz: {{Block}} - the point is that he should know to use {{unblock}}.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:40, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, done. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:49, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rose (Doctor Who)

Rose (Doctor Who) is a featured article on the pt.wikipedia.org, but I can't put that here. LuizM (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --ValterVB (talk) 18:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. LuizM (talk) 23:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

help needed

Please add cdo:Ià-lô-sák-lēng in Q1218. Thanks.--122.90.97.104 08:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ventosa de la Cuesta

Hi. Recently the article Ventosa de la Cuesta was approved as a good article in Wikipedia in spanish. Could you change its status? Thanks. --5truenos (talk) 11:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Stryn (talk) 11:12, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protect Q6981132

Could someone protect Naughty Boy (Q6981132) and switch it to a decent version? About two hours ago, heavy vandalism from several sources started on that page. Probably also good to check the IPs and accounts who participated in the vandalism and see what else they have done. --Denny (talk) 03:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Denny: I just protected the page a week and blocked all the offending accounts, but there are too many IPs to block. All IP addresses used to vandalize here have also been blocked 24 hours each. If anyone thinks my actions are in excess, they are free to revert them but should let me know about it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Jasper Deng: Thanks! --Denny (talk) 05:34, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User creating promotional items

User:TMCnola is creating a large amount of items that have obviously promotional descriptions. Could an admin mass-delete these? Thanks. --Biblioworm 20:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, Deleted and warned the user. --ValterVB (talk) 20:27, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, I also nuked his uploads on Commons. Multichill (talk) 21:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reforming admin inactivity RFC closed

Hello all. Just for your information, the RFC about changing administator inactivity criteria was closed by Bene* today. I have updated the specific changes to WD:A. Currently, inactivity is defined as less than five administrator/bureaucrat actions over a six month period. More details can be seen in the RFC. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any ideas? Maybe semiprotecing for a long, long time? --Succu (talk) 22:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, for a very long time. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect Paul Walker Q213864 (vandalism). --Bff (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warned (lvl 4), since it was just one IP that made nonsensical death date changes four times. I'll try to keep an eye on the item. It's sad that items whose subjects are people who suffered a horrible death are vandalized. --AmaryllisGardener talk 02:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, now I see that it gets IP vandalism about twice a month from different addresses (seems odd), so I decided on second thought to semi-protect it for a year. --AmaryllisGardener talk 02:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Q13799 vandalized

Hi, could somebody please revert the vandalic editions to Muntanyola (Q13799) until the last right edition? Thanks in advance.--Quico (talk) 10:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - In future you can use the "Restore" links to revert it yourself! ;) --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 10:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had try to put feature article for Serbian language, but I can not. Could you please do it for me or... --Bobik (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Stryn (talk) 17:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Single purpose account for vandalizing

That page gets repeatedly vandalized: [1]. --Denny (talk) 16:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. The page is protected again for a longer time and that user is blocked. --Stryn (talk) 16:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Denny (talk) 16:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

diet change

Hello,

I have translated a part of this article into Turkish and added some more knowledge but I cannot save the language link because it gives an error.

English:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diet_(nutrition) Turkish:https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diyet

✓ Done I moved link from Diète (Q1621905) to diet (Q474191). --ValterVB (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicados

Q5164524 <--> Q5784826 , son la misma persona. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 16:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done par ValterVB--Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merging Help

Help:Class or instance created by User:IP-80.134.90.212 should be merged into Help:Classification. --Succu (talk) 21:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, it should not. IP-80.134.90.212 (talk) 21:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Any reason why your „Help” fits not into Help:Classification#Classes and instances? --Succu (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It only discusses the question "class or instance?" and is not about classes and instances in general. IP-80.134.90.212 (talk) 21:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it should be merged. Help pages should be in a unified location and go into as much depth as possible to help inform and educate readers/new editors. Diverging similar information to multiple pages is not helpful. The page should be adapted to the classification page rather than a class/instance page which lacks depth. John F. Lewis (talk) 21:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Best fit then is Help:Basic membership properties, which also discusses the decision making. The approaches that I listed, go into more detail than the table on that page. It improve the decision making process that people are confronted with, when using the table above. The mere existence of discussions shows, that that help page alone was not sufficient. IP-80.134.90.212 (talk) 21:32, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Could you improve existing pages rather than creating new pages when other ones suit the topic if possible? John F. Lewis (talk) 21:34, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Of course! IP-80.134.90.212 (talk) 21:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I never got the idea of Basic membership properties. But I think this topic fits perfectly into the scope of Help:Classification, a crucial one. --Succu (talk) 21:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User IP-80.134.90.212 acting without consensus

Although repeatedly asked to stop and being pointed out that the edits are problematic, the user still continues to change Wikidata towards his understanding of P31, which seems to be contradictory to the understanding of the community at large. Since the user is creating damage which will be increasingly hard to fix, I would like to ask administrator to keep an eye on his actions. I have also put a request to cease this actions on the user's talk page.

Examples:

Furthermore, the user has in quickly come into conflict with a number of established editors, and has shown dismissive and unfriendly behavior in interactions. I find interactions with the user disruptive and discouraging. --Denny (talk) 22:00, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And this „personal affair”. --Succu (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The user seems to like disrupting things. I've posted a message to his/her tp because of an IMO inappropriate username (because it resembles an IP address) and so I'll keep an eye on that for a possible reply. I have a bad feeling about this. --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked IP-80.134.90.212, this person has plenty of usernames and a history of being abusive. Multichill (talk) 09:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Had to do some digging, see [2] for more information. Multichill (talk) 09:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Bene*: ^^ Multichill (talk) 11:12, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good article status on English Wikipedia, trying to add the badge to Wikidata

Hi! The article en:Maria Radner was recently added as a Good article. I tried to edit the links on Wikidata and add the English link as a Good article, but it says: "You are trying to add/remove badges to this item. At local Wikipedias adding or removing badges are done by consensus. Saving this edit was blocked and should be done only by administrators or trusted users. If you think you are correct, please contact an administrator." Could an administrator please add the Good article badge to the English Wikipedia article for Maria Radner? Thanks! CookieMonster755 (talk) 01:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --AmaryllisGardener talk 01:53, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]