Lexeme talk:L19340

F2

@KaMan: As you noted on my talk page: fix here. 2nd form is a special unicode one. Not sure how to specify that. I think it's good to have them to differentiate to the use as actual letters. --- Jura 08:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• I undid the change to Latin as language, as Roman numerals aren't limited to Latin. Similarly Arabic numerals aren't in Arabic. I don't mind the change to the lexical catagory, but it would be good to make sure it can be applied consistently. --- Jura 08:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
• Unicode includes both signs, so I don't think adding it to one is of much use. It's probably better to keep them as separate forms. --- Jura 08:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

  @Jura1: I have moved discussion to Wikidata_talk:Lexicographical_data#Roman_numerals KaMan (talk) 08:53, 8 September 2018 (UTC)