Property talk:P10339

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• List of values
• List of qualifiers
• Count

semantic gender
used when a word is only used to refer to people of this gender or to animals of this sex, independent of the grammatical gender

Represents	natural gender (Q2275697)
Data type	Item
Allowed values	male (Q6581097), female (Q6581072), male organism (Q44148), female organism (Q43445), not applicable, non-binary (Q48270), unknown or all genders (Q70853302)
Example	no label (L3625-S1) → female (Q6581072) no label (L412943-S1) → male organism (Q44148) no label (L6609-S1) → female (Q6581072) no label (L14769-S1) → female organism (Q43445) no label (L248778-S1) → not applicable
See also	grammatical gender (P5185), sex or gender (P21)
Lists	Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties By value of property Most statements Fewest statements Most sitelinks Most linked wikis Total of sitelinks on items Most identifiers Fewest identifiers Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Chart by item creation date Database reports/Constraint violations/P10339 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 2,156 Main statement 2,152 99.8% of uses Qualifier 4 0.2% of uses
Search for values

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Allowed entity types are Wikibase lexeme (Q51885771), Wikibase sense (Q54285715): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10339#Entity types

Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10339#Scope, SPARQL

Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10339#Single value, SPARQL

One of male (Q6581097), female (Q6581072), male organism (Q44148), female organism (Q43445), novalue, non-binary (Q48270), somevalue, all genders (Q70853302): value must be one of the specified items. Please expand list if needed. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10339#One of, values statistics, search, SPARQL

intentionally vague/inclusive values

@Nikki, ArthurPSmith, Lucas Werkmeister, VIGNERON, Mahir256, MasterRus21thCentury: some senses are intentionally vague like partner (L6154-S4) or significant other (L312592-S1). Should these be no value or should we make an gender inclusive item? I'd think no value means it has no gender where it should have possibly any gender – Shisma (talk) 13:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

I just noticed there is all genders (Q70853302) and it already used with this property – Shisma (talk) 14:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

@Shisma: very good question. I'll add one: should it be no value or rater unknown value? and what is the difference between the two? (if there is, I suspect for some languages there might be) same for differences with all genders (Q70853302). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 20:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

I don't see how those two words are any different from words like "person" or "child". You can deliberately use words which aren't gender-specific in order to be intentionally vague, but that's describing your intention when choosing that word. The word itself doesn't have any intentions, it just isn't specific to a particular gender. - Nikki (talk) 00:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)