Property talk:P1591
Documentation
person or organization accused at a trial
Description | person accused, at a trial | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Represents | respondent (Q7315941), plaintiff in (Q76433486) | ||||||||||||
Data type | Item | ||||||||||||
Domain | According to this template:
Trials, courts martial
When possible, data should only be stored as statements | ||||||||||||
Allowed values | person, organisation (note: this should be moved to the property statements) | ||||||||||||
Example | Trial of Thomas Paine (Q18327521) → Thomas Paine (Q126462) Fall of man (Q1135949) → Adam (Q70899) | ||||||||||||
Source | various (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property source website for the property (P1896)) | ||||||||||||
Tracking: usage | no label (Q122830218) | ||||||||||||
See also | defender (P1593), plaintiff (P1620), prosecutor (P1592), judge (P1594) | ||||||||||||
Lists |
| ||||||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
Current uses |
| ||||||||||||
Search for values |
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1591#Value type Q5, Q95074, Q43229, Q14623646, Q294414, Q167037, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1591#Type Q8016240, Q2334719, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1591#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1591#Entity types
![]() |
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
Inverse property
[edit]Wouldn’t the inverse property be something like “is defendant in” rather than plaintiff (P1620) as is currently the case?―BlaueBlüte (talk) 01:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Differentiating civil and criminal cases
[edit]In Swedish there is no word that can include both the respondent in a civil case as well as the person prosecuted in a criminal case. I wonder if this problem comes up in other legal traditions as well and if it therefore would make sense to split the property into for example respondent and defendant. Thoughts? Belteshassar (talk) 11:10, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Added 'minister' as a property constraint
[edit]I've added Q83307 as a property constraints. In English judicial review cases, the defendant in such an action is the Secretary of State for the appropriate department. For most immigration judicial reviews, it will be the Home Secretary (Q2484309). The position is being sued, not the individual. In the US, the individual is named, e.g. in a case like Q7313418.
This is somewhat clumsy, and if someone thinks up a better way of expressing this constraint, I'm happy for it to be changed. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC)