Property talk:P2859

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

X-SAMPA code
Extended Speech Assessment Methods Phonetic Alphabet (X-SAMPA) code for phoneme
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2859#Single value, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2859#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Type “phone (Q202064): item must contain property “subclass of (P279)” with classes “phone (Q202064)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2859#Type Q202064, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2859#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200), Wikibase form (Q54285143): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2859#Entity types
Item “IPA transcription (P898): Items with this property should also have “IPA transcription (P898)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2859#Item P898, search, SPARQL
Item “Kirshenbaum code (P3625): Items with this property should also have “Kirshenbaum code (P3625)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2859#Item P3625, search, SPARQL
Format “[ -~]+: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2859#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Format “(([a-zA-Z1-9@{}&?<>]\\?`?|[=|<>:!-]\\)(_([ac-ehjl-rtv-xABF-HL-ORTX0^<>\\/}\"+-]|\?\\|_?[=~]))*(:\\?)?|[%'"|^.-]|\|\||-\\)+: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2859#Format, SPARQL

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Use for forms in lexemes?[edit]

Can/should this property be used for the forms of lexemes? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 17:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ChristianKl, NMaia: Do you have an input on this issue? There is a CC0 database with SAMPA [1] which perhaps can be used, see, e.g., See [2]. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 13:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can't think of a reason why not! NMaia (talk) 15:06, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It was set to item of property constraint (P2305) Wikibase lexeme (Q51885771). I have changed that to item of property constraint (P2305) Wikibase form (Q54285143). — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 08:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with the constraints[edit]

Hi y'all,

We may need to revisit the constraints for this property, right now we have :

  • "Single value" 66 violations = 18 %
  • "Unique value" 21 violations = 6 %
  • "Type phone (Q202064)" 145 violations = 41 %
  • "Scope" 0 violation = 0 %
  • "Entity types" 0 violation = 0 %
  • "Item transcription API (P898)" 139 violations = 39 %
  • "Item Kirshenbaum (P3625)" 226 violations = 64 %
  • "Format" 0 violations = 0 %
  • "Format" 109 violations = 31 %

Some of these numbers are pretty high. @Fnielsen, ChristianKl, Tinker Bell, LitigiousOx, Roman Kerimov: I don't know much about X-SAMPA, could you take a look?

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When the property was created there were no lexemes, single value, unique value and the type phone constraint all don't apply to uses on lexemes. IPA transcriptions and kirshenbaum transcription could both be automatically generated, so that constraint is good. I don't know enough about whether the last format constraint should be changed. ChristianKl14:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have use the property for lexemes, see above "Use for forms in lexemes?". There might be multiple pronounciations for a form. Two different forms may be pronounced the same. So if the property is ok for use in lexemes some of the constraints should be changed. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]