Property talk:P3643

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

significant environmental impact
environmental issue determined to have a significant impact on the subject
DescriptionThe types of environmental issues determined to have a significant impact on the object.
Representsenvironmental impact assessment (Q320389)
Data typeItem
Template parameterförsurning/övergödning/... in w:sv:Template:Insjöfakta Sverige
Domainany geological feature or only body of water (Q15324) (see discussion) (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleOrlången (Q3424558)nutrient pollution (Q12203192)
1961 Monterey Bay algal bloom (Q118585022)bird disease (Q12040649)
Source
According to this template: pp.43-44 of WFD Reporting Guidance 2016 (pdf) and e.g. xml for all lakes in Finland (warning 13.1 MB
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P3643 (Q28792035)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total13,100
Main statement13,098>99.9% of uses
Qualifier2<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Value type “environmental issue (Q2144359), environmental process (Q112622562): This property should use items as value that contain property “subclass of (P279)”. On these, the value for subclass of (P279) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value environmental issue (Q2144359), environmental process (Q112622562) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3643#Value type Q2144359, Q112622562, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3643#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Required qualifier “point in time (P585): this property should be used with the listed qualifier. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3643#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3643#Entity types
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Constraints[edit]

I'm unsure whether {{Constraint:Type|class=Q2144359|relation=instance}} or {{Constraint:Value type|class=Q2144359|relation=instance}} is the right constraint to indicate that the values of this property should be instances of a subclass of environmental issue (Q2144359).

I'm also unsure how to encode the constraint. This property should be used with one of point in time (P585) or start time (P580) (which can be combined with end time (P582). /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 10:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Example qualifer use (from proposal)[edit]

To illustrate a more complex example: Acidified lake which was cleaned up in 2016 only to be found to suffer from eutrophication in 2017.

The middle case is I useful to illustrate years when the water body was reported as not suffering from any issues (as opposed to there not being any data for that year)./André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 07:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding restoration[edit]

I'm working on adding knowledge from restoration ecology to Wikidata. It would be very useful to have a property that describes the type of degradation that a practitioner is trying to restore from. For instance, we have many studies on restoring oil sands impacts (particularly well drilling and seismic lines). It would be great to be able to tag these studies.

It looks like this property is most suited for a particular place impacted by a stressor. Is there a modification or change that could make this a bit more general and useful for studies of stressors, like we see in restoration? Or should I propose a new property? Tim.Alamenciak (talk) 20:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]