Property talk:P3680

Documentation

• Start a query
• Properties using this qualifier (statistics)
• Count

statement supported by
entity that supports a given statement

Description	entity that supports a given statement
Represents	controversy (Q1255828), opinion (Q3962655)
Data type	Item
Example	Choekyi Gyaltsen, 10th Panchen Lama (Q83312) followed by (P156) Panchen Erdeni Choskyi Gyalpo (Q724350), <statement supported by> People's Republic of China (Q148); Choekyi Gyaltsen, 10th Panchen Lama (Q83312) followed by (P156) Gedhun Choekyi Nyima (Q372526), <statement supported by> Central Tibetan Administration (Q326343) Use of designated as terrorist by (P3461) can be replaced with instance of (P31) terrorist organization (Q17127659) with this qualifier (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property Wikidata property example (P1855), Wikidata property example for properties (P2271), Wikidata property example for lexemes (P5192), Wikidata property example for forms (P5193) or Wikidata property example for senses (P5977))
See also	criterion used (P1013), statement disputed by (P1310), nature of statement (P5102)
Lists	Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Chart by item creation date Database reports/Constraint violations/P3680
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 167,176 Main statement 78 <0.1% of uses Qualifier 166,715 99.7% of uses Reference 383 0.2% of uses
Search for values

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Scope is as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3680#Scope, SPARQL

Discussion

I think we forgot about approved by (P790). d1g (talk) 05:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

@D1gggg: Looks like it. I think maybe we should get rid of the qualifier use of P790 rather than delete this, though. (Not certain.) Still, we definitely shouldn't have a duplicate. --Yair rand (talk) 22:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Use in references ?

I used this property in a reference snak to source a religion claim : https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q329&oldid=997580975#P140 . It’s a constraint violation but I don’t really think it should be. We have stuff to say that something is stated in a news article, « stated in », but not really « by whom », here it’s the case of a person that proclaims something in an event, that thing is reported in a newspaper article. statement supported by (P3680) seems perfect to say the « who » said. author  TomT0m / talk page 08:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)