Property talk:P3804

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

TV Guide show ID (former scheme)
ID of a television program at TV Guide
Applicable "stated in" valueTVGuide.com (Q86537902)
Data typeExternal identifier
Corresponding templateTemplate:TV Guide show (Q14399533)
Template parameteren:Template:TV Guide show
Domain
According to this template: television program
According to statements in the property:
human (Q5), film (Q11424) or broadcasting program (Q11578774)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values\d+
ExampleVeritas: The Quest (Q2530070)100564
You Me Her (Q24514642)911601
Sourcehttps://www.tvguide.com/
Formatter URLhttps://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/wd/$1
Related to country United States of America (Q30) (See 762 others)
See alsoTV Guide person ID (former scheme) (P3845)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total18,100
Main statement18,094>99.9% of uses
Qualifier2<0.1% of uses
Reference4<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3804#Unique value, hourly updated report, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3804#Single value, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Format “\d{6,7}|\d{10}|: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3804#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Type “human (Q5), film (Q11424), broadcasting program (Q11578774): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “human (Q5), film (Q11424), broadcasting program (Q11578774)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3804#Type Q5, Q11424, Q11578774, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3804#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3804#Scope, SPARQL

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Discussion[edit]

New scheme[edit]

There is a report about a change of scheme at here. Accordingly, I de-activated the formatter url. If the new ids are to be stored, a different property should be used. --- Jura 21:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added a formatter URL which works with the old and new ID numbers. Examples for Veritas: The Quest (Q2530070):
Old ID: https://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/-/100564/
New ID: https://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/-/1030264268/
Either one redirects to: https://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/veritas-the-quest/1030264268/
-- Zyxw (talk) 02:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am not suggesting this property be repurposed. I had added a format constraint to limit it to these old ID numbers which are 6 or 7 digits. The new 10 digit ID numbers can go in a new property once it is created. But if there is an updated TVGuide.com formatter URL that works with these old ID numbers, why shouldn't we use it? -- Zyxw (talk) 14:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The formatter could indeed be updated and the constraint is helpful. It seems I misunderstood the addition of an id in the new scheme as sample of values to add [1]. I guess we should just skip that part. --- Jura 13:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]