Property talk:P6116

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

chord progression
series of chords used in this musical work
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “musical work (Q2188189): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “musical work (Q2188189)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6116#Type Q2188189, SPARQL
Value type “chord progression (Q1326471), chord (Q170439): This property should use items as value that contain property “subclass of (P279)”. On these, the value for subclass of (P279) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value chord progression (Q1326471), chord (Q170439) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6116#Value type Q1326471, Q170439, SPARQL

Usage[edit]

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, ArthurPSmith, Germartin1, Cwf97, Alexander Doria: I've tried using this at Someone Like You (Q166904), with new items for all of the progressions. (I tried to pick a simple example but forgot the song has at least five different progressions as well as time signature changes.) I've left out some of the lists of chords because some of the items don't exist yet. I've only gone to the end of the first chorus, but other than the bridge the rest of the song should look almost the same.

Is there anything that could be improved about the structure/statements? In particular, since it would sometimes be appropriate to use a single chord as a value for this property on items about compositions/tracks, should the items for the chord progressions themselves use chord progression (P6116) or has part(s) (P527) to list the chords? Jc86035 (talk) 14:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think the relation to the main key is the more important one, which you're capturing via the subclass relations. But you seem to be doing a nice job of modeling here, I don't have any strong opinions on ways to do it differently. ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]