Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study (Q33829090)

29 July 2017

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study (English)

1 reference

29 July 2017

1 reference

3

Isabelle Boutron

0 references

Douglas G. Altman

9

object named as

Douglas G Altman

1 reference

29 July 2017

Larissa Shamseer

8

0 references

Jonathan A. Cook

object named as

Jonathan Cook

5

0 references

Gary S. Collins

object named as

Gary S Collins

2

0 references

author name string

Sally Hopewell

1

1 reference

29 July 2017

Ly-Mee Yu

4

1 reference

29 July 2017

Milensu Shanyinde

6

1 reference

29 July 2017

Rose Wharton

7

1 reference

29 July 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 July 2014

1 reference

29 July 2017

1 reference

29 July 2017

349

1 reference

29 July 2017

g4145

1 reference

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review

29 July 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Opening up BMJ peer review

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Suspended judgment. Editorial peer review: let us put it on trial

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

4 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Masking author identity in peer review: what factors influence masking success? PEER Investigators

29 October 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4077234

Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizado

29 October 2018

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24986891

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.1136/BMJ.G4145

1 reference

29 July 2017

1 reference

29 July 2017

1 reference